Literature DB >> 11193247

Relative influence of physical activity, muscle mass and strength on bone density.

D N Proctor1, L J Melton, S Khosla, C S Crowson, M K O'Connor, B L Riggs.   

Abstract

In a population-based sample of 348 men (age 22-90 years) and 351 women (age 21-93 years), we evaluated the relationship of bone density assessed at a variety of skeletal sites by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) with various muscle mass estimates obtained also from the DXA scan and with physical activity by interview and strength assessed both subjectively and objectively. All these parameters declined with age as judged from these cross-sectional data. All estimates of total skeletal muscle mass were strongly correlated with bone density at different skeletal sites. Muscle mass, in turn, was correlated with physical activity and hand strength. In multivariate models including these variables, muscle mass was the strongest determinant of bone density, accounting for 6-53% (mean 27%) of the variance at the different skeletal sites. Physical activity (and/or a physical activity x age interaction) was an independent predictor of bone mass in 48% of the site-specific models and accounted for 0.03-39% (mean 10%) of the variance, while hand strength (and/or a hand strength x age interaction) accounted for up to 4% (mean 1%) of the variance as an independent predictor of bone density in a third of the models. Although these variables together accounted for a large proportion of the variance in bone density, other potential predictors were not assessed in these analyses. The dramatic decline in physical activity over life seemed unable to completely explain the age-related loss of bone mass, and additional research is needed to determine whether the relationship of muscle mass with bone density is a direct one or due instead to other factors such as circulating hormone levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11193247     DOI: 10.1007/s001980070033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  36 in total

1.  Lower Lean Mass Measured by Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) is Not Associated with Increased Risk of Hip Fracture in Women: The Framingham Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  Robert R McLean; Douglas P Kiel; Sarah D Berry; Kerry E Broe; Xiaochun Zhang; L Adrienne Cupples; Marian T Hannan
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 2.  Physical inactivity: a risk factor and target for intervention in renal care.

Authors:  Dorien M Zelle; Gerald Klaassen; Edwin van Adrichem; Stephan J L Bakker; Eva Corpeleijn; Gerjan Navis
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 28.314

3.  Skeletal muscle mass is associated with bone geometry and microstructure and serum insulin-like growth factor binding protein-2 levels in adult women and men.

Authors:  Nathan K Lebrasseur; Sara J Achenbach; L Joseph Melton; Shreyasee Amin; Sundeep Khosla
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Sex Differences in the Effects of Weight Loss Diets on Bone Mineral Density and Body Composition: POUNDS LOST Trial.

Authors:  Amir Tirosh; Russell J de Souza; Frank Sacks; George A Bray; Steven R Smith; Meryl S LeBoff
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 5.  Interaction between bone and muscle in older persons with mobility limitations.

Authors:  L Ferrucci; M Baroni; A Ranchelli; F Lauretani; M Maggio; P Mecocci; C Ruggiero
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.116

6.  Gender differences in relationships between body composition components, their distribution and bone mineral density: a cross-sectional opposite sex twin study.

Authors:  Joanna Makovey; Vasi Naganathan; Philip Sambrook
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-04-19       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Bone health in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  J C Gibson; G D Summers
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-05-21       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Contribution of lean tissue mass to the urban-rural difference in bone mineral density.

Authors:  Chatlert Pongchaiyakul; Tuan V Nguyen; Vongsvat Kosulwat; Nipa Rojroongwasinkul; Somsri Charoenkiatkul; John A Eisman; Rajata Rajatanavin
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 9.  Osteoporosis in men.

Authors:  Sundeep Khosla; Shreyasee Amin; Eric Orwoll
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 19.871

10.  Relative contributions of multiple determinants to bone mineral density in men.

Authors:  G R Chiu; A B Araujo; T G Travison; S A Hall; J B McKinlay
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.