Literature DB >> 11192220

Performance of Air-O-Cell, Burkard, and Button Samplers for total enumeration of airborne spores.

V Aizenberg1, T Reponen, S A Grinshpun, K Willeke.   

Abstract

Performance of three devices used for the total enumeration of airborne spores-the Air-O-Cell sampling cassette, the Burkard personal volumetric air sampler, and the Button Aerosol Sampler--was evaluated under controlled laboratory conditions. The first two are glass-slide impactors; the third collects spores on a filter. The samplers were challenged with 0.44-5.10 microm polystyrene latex particles and five microorganisms of 0.84-3.07 microm mean aerodynamic diameter: Streptomyces albus, Bacillus subtilis, Cladosporium cladosporioides, Penicillium brevicompactum, and Penicillium melinii. An optical particle counter measured the particle concentrations upstream and downstream of each sampler, and thus determined the physical collection efficiency of the three samplers. Collection efficiency of the Button Aerosol Sampler was close to 100% for the entire particle size range studied. The cut-off size of each impactor was 2.3-2.4 microm. Acridine orange (with epifluorescent microscopy) and lactophenol cotton blue (with bright light microscopy) staining techniques were used for the microscopic enumeration of spores. No significant difference in microscopic counts was found (at the 95% significance level) when using these two techniques with the Button Aerosol Sampler filters. When the lactophenol cotton blue staining was used to compare total microbial counts yielded by all three samplers, the Button Sampler showed significantly higher counts for the smaller size microorganisms (B. subtilis and C. cladosporioides). For the larger microorganisms (P. brevicompactum and P. melinii) all three samplers yielded similar results. Uniformity of particle deposition on the collection surface was highest for the Button Aerosol Sampler due to the design of its inlet. Thus, the filter collection method used with the Button Aerosol Sampler is suitable and can be advantageous for the enumeration of total airborne spores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11192220     DOI: 10.1080/15298660008984598

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AIHAJ        ISSN: 1529-8663


  19 in total

Review 1.  Methods for aeroallergen sampling.

Authors:  Estelle Levetin
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.806

2.  On the efficiency and correction of vertically oriented blunt bioaerosol samplers in moving air.

Authors:  Dominik Michel; Mathias W Rotach; Regula Gehrig; Roland Vogt
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 3.787

3.  A simple polymerase chain reaction/restriction fragment length polymorphism assay capable of identifying medically relevant filamentous fungi.

Authors:  Timothy R Dean; Michael Kohan; Doris Betancourt; Marc Y Menetrez
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.695

4.  Assessment of fungal contamination in moldy homes: comparison of different methods.

Authors:  R Todd Niemeier; Satheesh K Sivasubramani; Tiina Reponen; Sergey A Grinshpun
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.155

5.  Analysis of short-term influences of ambient aeroallergens on pediatric asthma hospital visits.

Authors:  Wei Zhong; Linda Levin; Tiina Reponen; Gurjit K Hershey; Atin Adhikari; Rakesh Shukla; Grace LeMasters
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  A simple polymerase chain reaction-sequencing analysis capable of identifying multiple medically relevant filamentous fungal species.

Authors:  Timothy R Dean; Michael Kohan; Doris Betancourt; Marc Y Menetrez
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.574

7.  Mold spore penetration through wall service outlets: a pilot study.

Authors:  Brad Muise; Dong-Chul Seo; E Earl Blair; Trent Applegate
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Determining fungi rRNA copy number by PCR.

Authors:  Jonathan Black; Timothy Dean; Grace Byfield; Karin Foarde; Marc Menetrez
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2013-04

9.  Collection efficiencies of an electrostatic sampler with superhydrophobic surface for fungal bioaerosols.

Authors:  T Han; Y Nazarenko; P J Lioy; G Mainelis
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 5.770

10.  Comparison of indoor air sampling and dust collection methods for fungal exposure assessment using quantitative PCR.

Authors:  Jennie Cox; Reshmi Indugula; Stephen Vesper; Zheng Zhu; Roman Jandarov; Tiina Reponen
Journal:  Environ Sci Process Impacts       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 4.238

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.