Literature DB >> 11192134

Phase III, randomized, double-blind study of clarithromycin extended-release and immediate-release formulations in the treatment of adult patients with acute maxillary sinusitis.

J J Murray1, E Solomon, D McCluskey, J Zhang, R Palmer, G Notario.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clarithromycin has an established bacteriologic efficacy and safety profile in the treatment of respiratory tract infections.
OBJECTIVE: This study compares the efficacy and tolerability of extended-release and immediate-release formulations of clarithromycin in patients with acute maxillary sinusitis.
METHODS: Fourteen days' treatment with once-daily clarithromycin was compared with the immediate-release, twice-daily formulation in a phase III, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter study. Patients aged > or =12 years with signs, symptoms, and a radiologically confirmed diagnosis of acute maxillary sinusitis were eligible. Patients were assessed before treatment, within 48 hours after treatment, on study days 16 to 18, and at the test-of-cure visit on study days 24 to 31. Patients who received > or =1 dose of study drug were included in the safety analysis.
RESULTS: Of 283 patients treated, 245 were included in the efficacy analysis (122 in the extended-release group, 123 in the immediate-release group). Treatment groups were well matched with respect to demographic characteristics and medical condition and history. At the test-of-cure visit, 85% of patients in the clarithromycin extended-release group and 79% in the immediate-release group were deemed clinical cures; 89% and 91% in the extended-release and immediate-release groups, respectively, demonstrated radiographic success. Overall incidences of study drug-related adverse events were similar in the 2 treatment groups (32% in the extended-release group and 28% in the immediate-release group); however, significantly fewer patients receiving extended-release clarithromycin (2/142 11%]), compared with those receiving the immediate-release formulation (10/141 [7%]: P = 0.02) discontinued therapy because of drug-related gastrointestinal symptoms or abnormal taste. No clinically meaningful changes in laboratory values or vital signs were observed during the study.
CONCLUSION: Although the efficacy of the 2 formulations was comparable, once-daily clarithromycin extended-release was better tolerated than the twice-daily immediate-release formulation by patients with acute maxillary sinusitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11192134     DOI: 10.1016/s0149-2918(00)83041-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  5 in total

Review 1.  Sinusitis (acute).

Authors:  Kim Ah-See
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2011-12-21

2.  Randomized double-blind study comparing 3- and 6-day regimens of azithromycin with a 10-day amoxicillin-clavulanate regimen for treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis.

Authors:  Dan C Henry; Ernie Riffer; William N Sokol; Naumann I Chaudry; Robert N Swanson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Sinusitis (acute).

Authors:  Kim Ah-See
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2008-03-10

4.  Generic versus non-generic formulation of extended-release clarithromycin in patients with community-acquired respiratory tract infections: a prospective, randomized, comparative, investigator-blind, multicentre study.

Authors:  J R Snyman; H S Schoeman; M P Grobusch; M Henning; W Rabie; M Hira; K Parshotam; Y Mithal; S Singh; Z Ramdas
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.859

5.  Compliance with once-daily versus twice or thrice-daily administration of antibiotic regimens: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Matthew E Falagas; Apostolos K A Karagiannis; Theodora Nakouti; Giannoula S Tansarli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.