Literature DB >> 11191056

Angiogenesis assays: problems and pitfalls.

R Auerbach1, N Akhtar, R L Lewis, B L Shinners.   

Abstract

Many studies of angiogenesis inducers and inhibitors rely on in vitro or in vivo models as indicators of efficacy. However, as valuable as these models are, there are limitations to each one of these. This overview describes some of the principal methods now in use and discusses the advantages and some of the limitations of these methods. It is suggested that multiple assays, involving both in vitro and in vivo assays, are at present the best way to minimize the problems inherent in any specific assay.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11191056     DOI: 10.1023/a:1026574416001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev        ISSN: 0167-7659            Impact factor:   9.264


  39 in total

Review 1.  Current methods for assaying angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Carolyn A Staton; Stephen M Stribbling; Simon Tazzyman; Russell Hughes; Nicola J Brown; Claire E Lewis
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 2.  Emerging techniques to treat corneal neovascularisation.

Authors:  J Menzel-Severing
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Novel human-derived extracellular matrix induces in vitro and in vivo vascularization and inhibits fibrosis.

Authors:  Marc C Moore; Vittoria Pandolfi; Peter S McFetridge
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 4.  In vitro models of angiogenesis.

Authors:  Areck A Ucuzian; Howard P Greisler
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  In vitro assays of angiogenesis for assessment of angiogenic and anti-angiogenic agents.

Authors:  Anne M Goodwin
Journal:  Microvasc Res       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 3.514

6.  Extraction and assembly of tissue-derived gels for cell culture and tissue engineering.

Authors:  Shiri Uriel; Edwardine Labay; Megan Francis-Sedlak; Monica L Moya; Ralph R Weichselbaum; Natalia Ervin; Zdravka Cankova; Eric M Brey
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.056

7.  45S5-Bioglass(®)-based 3D-scaffolds seeded with human adipose tissue-derived stem cells induce in vivo vascularization in the CAM angiogenesis assay.

Authors:  Marina Handel; Timo R Hammer; Patcharakamon Nooeaid; Aldo R Boccaccini; Dirk Hoefer
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 3.845

8.  Procedure for the development of multi-depth circular cross-sectional endothelialized microchannels-on-a-chip.

Authors:  Xiang Li; Samantha Marie Mearns; Manuela Martins-Green; Yuxin Liu
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 9.  A critical analysis of current in vitro and in vivo angiogenesis assays.

Authors:  Carolyn A Staton; Malcolm W R Reed; Nicola J Brown
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 10.  Following up tumour angiogenesis: from the basic laboratory to the clinic.

Authors:  José L Orgaz; Beatriz Martínez-Poveda; Nuria I Fernández-García; Benilde Jiménez
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.405

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.