A A Chalian1, S H Kagan. 1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104-4283, USA. chaliana@mail.med.upenn.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The operating room (OR) presents a high-risk environment for pressure injury. We designed a project to improve performance in the prevention of intraoperative pressure ulcers in extended length head and neck surgeries for malignancies (ELS) using a fluid mattress (RIK) intraoperatively. METHODS: A descriptive design was used to monitor performance improvement in this underrecognized aspect of patient care. A fluid, pressure-reducing OR mattress (RIK) was compared with the use of a standard foam OR mattress (Skytron). A convenience group of 36 consecutive patients, undergoing ELS, was included in the project. Patients were evaluated for presence or absence of a pressure ulcer immediately and 72 hours postoperatively. RESULTS: Patient groups were demographically and surgically comparable at a clinical level. Pressure ulcer incidence before intervention was 21% (4 of 19). This declined to 0% after intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative pressure ulcers are a costly complication. Presence of a pressure ulcer extends time in the sick role and disrupts desired aesthetic outcomes. Use of a pressure-reducing device achieved the performance improvement objective. Implications for future research and current care are discussed.
BACKGROUND: The operating room (OR) presents a high-risk environment for pressure injury. We designed a project to improve performance in the prevention of intraoperative pressure ulcers in extended length head and neck surgeries for malignancies (ELS) using a fluid mattress (RIK) intraoperatively. METHODS: A descriptive design was used to monitor performance improvement in this underrecognized aspect of patient care. A fluid, pressure-reducing OR mattress (RIK) was compared with the use of a standard foam OR mattress (Skytron). A convenience group of 36 consecutive patients, undergoing ELS, was included in the project. Patients were evaluated for presence or absence of a pressure ulcer immediately and 72 hours postoperatively. RESULTS:Patient groups were demographically and surgically comparable at a clinical level. Pressure ulcer incidence before intervention was 21% (4 of 19). This declined to 0% after intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative pressure ulcers are a costly complication. Presence of a pressure ulcer extends time in the sick role and disrupts desired aesthetic outcomes. Use of a pressure-reducing device achieved the performance improvement objective. Implications for future research and current care are discussed.
Authors: Min Hee Heo; Ji Yeon Kim; Beom Il Park; Sang Il Lee; Kyung-Tae Kim; Jang Su Park; Won Joo Choe; Jun Hyun Kim Journal: Saudi J Anaesth Date: 2022-01-04