Literature DB >> 11189082

Comparison of clinical indicators for performance measurement of health care quality: a cautionary note.

P A Gross1, B I Braun, S B Kritchevsky, B P Simmons.   

Abstract

The use of clinical performance data is increasing rapidly. Yet, substantial variation exists across indicators designed to measure the same clinical event. We compared indicators from several indicator measurement systems to determine the consistency of results. Five measurement systems with well-defined indicators were selected. They were applied to 24 hospitals. Indicators for mortality from coronary artery bypass graft surgery and mortality in the perioperative period were chosen from these measurement systems. Analyses results and concludes that it is faulty to assume that clinical indicators derived from different measurement systems will give the same rank order. Widespread demand for external release of outcome data from hospitals must be balanced by an educational effort about the factors that influence and potentially confound reported rates.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11189082     DOI: 10.1108/14664100010361755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Perform Qual Health Care        ISSN: 1063-0279


  2 in total

1.  Performance measurement in healthcare: part II--state of the science findings by stage of the performance measurement process.

Authors:  Carol E Adair; Elizabeth Simpson; Ann L Casebeer; Judith M Birdsell; Katharine A Hayden; Steven Lewis
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2006-07

2.  Hospital diagnostic aggregation and risk-adjusted quality.

Authors:  Chun Lok K Li
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 3.402

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.