Literature DB >> 11188494

Intraclass correlations from a community-based alcohol prevention study: the effect of repeat observations on the same communities.

D M Murray1, M H Clark, A C Wagenaar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: School- and community-based alcohol prevention programs are often evaluated using a group-randomized trial (GRT) design with a single pretest and a single posttest survey. To size such studies properly, investigators need accurate estimates of the variance and intraclass correlation that will be operative in their analyses. Until recently, the only available estimates were based on cross-sectional analyses. A recent report suggests that values from cross-sectional analyses may overestimate the intraclass correlation operative in pretest-posttest analyses. The purpose of this article is to review these issues, present estimates of intraclass correlation for a variety of alcohol-related endpoints based on cross-sectional analyses and to compare those estimates to estimates based on pretest-posttest analyses. We will also show how these estimates can be used to establish optimal sample sizes for GRTs to evaluate school- and community-based alcohol prevention programs.
METHOD: Data were collected from 18 to 20 year olds and high-school seniors as part of an alcohol prevention effort employing a group-randomized trial design with a single pretest and a single posttest survey. Data were analyzed via mixed-model regression methods to estimate components of variance. Those components were then used to compute the intraclass correlations operative in both cross-sectional analyses and in pretest-posttest analyses.
RESULTS: Results indicate that intraclass correlations operative in pretest-posttest analyses are much smaller than are those operative in cross-sectional analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that future alcohol-prevention studies employing a group-randomized trial design with a single pretest and single posttest survey may not need to be as large as previously suggested by intraclass correlation estimates based on cross-sectional data. This holds true even if they are analyzed to reflect the extra variation typical of group-randomized trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11188494     DOI: 10.15288/jsa.2000.61.881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Stud Alcohol        ISSN: 0096-882X


  7 in total

Review 1.  Design and analysis of group-randomized trials: a review of recent methodological developments.

Authors:  David M Murray; Sherri P Varnell; Jonathan L Blitstein
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Comparison of intraclass correlation coefficient estimates and standard errors between using cross-sectional and repeated measurement data: the Safety Check cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Edward H Ip; Richard Wasserman; Shari Barkin
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Community variation in risk and protective factors and substance use outcomes.

Authors:  J David Hawkins; M Lee Van Horn; Michael W Arthur
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2004-12

4.  The multilevel structure of four adolescent problems.

Authors:  Keith Smolkowski; Anthony Biglan; Clyde Dent; John Seeley
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2006-09

5.  The importance and role of intracluster correlations in planning cluster trials.

Authors:  John S Preisser; Beth A Reboussin; Eun-Young Song; Mark Wolfson
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.822

6.  Planning a cluster randomized trial with unequal cluster sizes: practical issues involving continuous outcomes.

Authors:  Lydia Guittet; Philippe Ravaud; Bruno Giraudeau
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2006-04-12       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  A priori postulated and real power in cluster randomized trials: mind the gap.

Authors:  Lydia Guittet; Bruno Giraudeau; Philippe Ravaud
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2005-08-18       Impact factor: 4.615

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.