Literature DB >> 11188451

Improving qualitative proposals: common problem areas.

L M Connelly1, L H Yoder.   

Abstract

Advanced practice nurses conducting clinical research may decide to use qualitative methods. These types of studies also are now receiving more positive consideration for funding than they have in the past. When writing a proposal for research projects, investigators new to qualitative research frequently have misconceptions about this type of research and the assumptions on which the research is based. These misconceptions lead to problems within the proposals that make it difficult for reviewers to evaluate adequately the research plan. In this article, the authors outline problems frequently observed in qualitative proposals, offer advice on how to correct the problems, and provide some examples from their own funded proposals.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11188451     DOI: 10.1097/00002800-200003000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Nurse Spec        ISSN: 0887-6274            Impact factor:   1.067


  3 in total

1.  A mixed methods study of symptom perception in patients with chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Barbara Riegel; Victoria Vaughan Dickson; Christopher S Lee; Marguerite Daus; Julia Hill; Elliane Irani; Solim Lee; Joyce W Wald; Stephen T Moelter; Lisa Rathman; Megan Streur; Foster Osei Baah; Linda Ruppert; Daniel R Schwartz; Alfred Bove
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 2.210

2.  Factors influencing orthopedic nurses' pain management: A focused ethnography.

Authors:  Kayla J Denness; Eloise C J Carr; Cydnee Seneviratne; Janice M Rae
Journal:  Can J Pain       Date:  2017-12-19

3.  Describing qualitative research undertaken with randomised controlled trials in grant proposals: a documentary analysis.

Authors:  Sarah J Drabble; Alicia O'Cathain; Kate J Thomas; Anne Rudolph; Jenny Hewison
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 4.615

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.