Literature DB >> 11187086

Guideline development in Europe. An international comparison.

.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify major differences and similarities in the development of clinical guidelines in different European countries.
METHODS: A collaboration of researchers is funded by the European Commission to compare the approaches to guideline development in collaborators' countries. The program encompasses a series of tasks, the first being to identify and document current guideline procedures in the collaborating countries. A survey gathered information on guideline production, dissemination, and implementation in the 10 European countries involved in the project consortium: Denmark, England and Wales, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Scotland, Spain (both the Basque Country and Catalonia), and Switzerland.
RESULTS: Seven countries have a national policy on guideline production, dissemination, and implementation, and three countries are discussing their policies. A majority of guidelines are currently produced at the national level in six of the countries and at the regional or local level in the other four. Central or national funding supports guideline production in six countries. Additional sources of funding include medical societies, pharmaceutical companies, and health insurance companies. Several of the countries have published or are preparing evaluations of their dissemination strategies.
CONCLUSIONS: The survey highlighted wide variation in the methods and policies of guideline development in Europe. The Appraisal of Guidelines, Research, and Evaluation in Europe (AGREE) Collaboration research program will identify the characteristics of the "better" guideline programs and will provide the basis for more research-generated policy initiatives in the future, helping to ensure that guidelines play a major role in improving patient care in the millennium.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11187086     DOI: 10.1017/s0266462300103101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care        ISSN: 0266-4623            Impact factor:   2.188


  16 in total

1.  Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project.

Authors: 
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-02

Review 2.  Development of Quality Management Systems for Clinical Practice Guidelines in Korea.

Authors:  Heui-Sug Jo; Dong Ik Kim; Sung-Goo Chang; Ein-Soon Shin; Moo-Kyung Oh
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 3.  [Evidence based guidelines and clinical pathways: complementation or contradiction?].

Authors:  M Lelgemann; G Ollenschläger
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 0.743

4.  Hypertension guidelines and their effects on the health system.

Authors:  Wilhelm Frank; Brigitte Konta
Journal:  GMS Health Technol Assess       Date:  2005-12-21

Review 5.  The Global Spine Care Initiative: applying evidence-based guidelines on the non-invasive management of back and neck pain to low- and middle-income communities.

Authors:  Roger Chou; Pierre Côté; Kristi Randhawa; Paola Torres; Hainan Yu; Margareta Nordin; Eric L Hurwitz; Scott Haldeman; Christine Cedraschi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  The Global Spine Care Initiative: a summary of guidelines on invasive interventions for the management of persistent and disabling spinal pain in low- and middle-income communities.

Authors:  Emre Acaroğlu; Margareta Nordin; Kristi Randhawa; Roger Chou; Pierre Côté; Tiro Mmopelwa; Scott Haldeman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Mono-disciplinary or multidisciplinary back pain guidelines? How can we achieve a common message in primary care?

Authors:  Alan C Breen; Maurits W van Tulder; Bart W Koes; Irene Jensen; Rhoda Reardon; Gert Bronfort
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-06-02       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Development and implementation of clinical practice guidelines: current status in Korea.

Authors:  Hyeong Sik Ahn; Hyun Jung Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 2.153

9.  Clinical practice guidelines: towards better quality guidelines and increased international collaboration.

Authors:  R Grol; F A Cluzeau; J S Burgers
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 10.  Identifying and managing patients at high risk for fractures: conclusions from the second Spanish multidisciplinary forum-parathyroid hormone use in osteoporotic patients at high risk for fractures.

Authors:  Esteban Jódar Gimeno
Journal:  Drugs R D       Date:  2012-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.