Literature DB >> 11186227

Cognitive impairment and synaptosomal choline uptake in rats following impact acceleration injury.

R H Schmidt1, K J Scholten, P H Maughan.   

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury is well known to cause deficits in learning and memory, which typically improve with time. Animal studies with fluid percussion or controlled cortical impact injury have identified transient disturbances in forebrain cholinergic innervation which may contribute to such cognitive problems. This study examines the extent to which water maze performance and forebrain synaptosomal choline uptake are affected one week after injury using the newly developed impact acceleration injury model. Injury or sham injury was delivered to adult male Sprague-Dawley rats under halothane anesthesia using a 500-g 2.1-m weight drop. Based on righting reflex, injured rats were divided into moderate (< or = 12 min) or severe (>12 min) groups. Water maze testing was performed on days 5-7 postinjury. On day 7, choline uptake was determined in synaptosomes from hippocampus, a parietal cortex, and entorhinal cortex. Maze learning was severely impaired in the severe injury group but not in the moderate injury group. Learning retention was slightly impaired in the moderate injury group and severely affected in the severe injury group. There was a very strong correlation between the severity of injury as determined by prolongation of righting times and disruption of maze learning at 1 week postinjury. There was no change in synaptosomal choline uptake in any of the forebrain regions in the severe injury group, but a slight (14%) decrease in the hippocampus and parietal cortex of the moderate injury group. Correlation analysis showed no relationship between synaptosomal choline uptake in any brain region and performance in either water maze learning or retention. This study shows that the impact acceleration model produces cognitive impairments equivalent to those seen with fluid percussion injury and controlled cortical impact. Compared with those models, the impact acceleration model does not produce a similar disruption of forebrain cholinergic nerve terminals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11186227     DOI: 10.1089/neu.2000.17.1129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  16 in total

1.  Elucidating the severity of preclinical traumatic brain injury models: a role for functional assessment?

Authors:  Ryan C Turner; Reyna L VanGilder; Zachary J Naser; Brandon P Lucke-Wold; Julian E Bailes; Rae R Matsumoto; Jason D Huber; Charles L Rosen
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 2.  Biologic and plastic effects of experimental traumatic brain injury treatment paradigms and their relevance to clinical rehabilitation.

Authors:  Alexandra N Garcia; Mansi A Shah; C Edward Dixon; Amy K Wagner; Anthony E Kline
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.298

3.  Treatment of mild traumatic brain injury with an erythropoietin-mimetic peptide.

Authors:  Claudia S Robertson; Robert Garcia; Samson Sujit Kumar Gaddam; Raymond J Grill; Carla Cerami Hand; Tian Siva Tian; H Julia Hannay
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 5.269

4.  Material characterization and computer model simulation of low density polyurethane foam used in a rodent traumatic brain injury model.

Authors:  Liying Zhang; Manish Gurao; King H Yang; Albert I King
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 5.  Animal models of head trauma.

Authors:  Ibolja Cernak
Journal:  NeuroRx       Date:  2005-07

Review 6.  Animal models of traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Ye Xiong; Asim Mahmood; Michael Chopp
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  A novel PARP inhibitor L-2286 in a rat model of impact acceleration head injury: an immunohistochemical and behavioral study.

Authors:  Erzsébet Kövesdi; Péter Bukovics; Valérie Besson; József Nyirádi; János Lückl; József Pál; Balázs Sümegi; Tamás Dóczi; István Hernádi; András Büki
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 8.  Using anesthetics and analgesics in experimental traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Rachel K Rowe; Jordan L Harrison; Theresa C Thomas; James R Pauly; P David Adelson; Jonathan Lifshitz
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 12.625

9.  Evaluation of a combined therapeutic regimen of 8-OH-DPAT and environmental enrichment after experimental traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Anthony E Kline; Rose L McAloon; Kate A Henderson; Utsav K Bansal; Bhaskar M Ganti; Rashid H Ahmed; Robert B Gibbs; Christopher N Sozda
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 5.269

10.  A delayed and chronic treatment regimen with the 5-HT1A receptor agonist 8-OH-DPAT after cortical impact injury facilitates motor recovery and acquisition of spatial learning.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Cheng; Ann N Hoffman; Ross D Zafonte; Anthony E Kline
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.