Literature DB >> 11186024

Redressing dis-advantage: promoting vertical equity within South Africa.

D McIntyre1, L Gilson.   

Abstract

This paper represents the first attempt to apply vertical equity principles to the South African health sector. A vertical equity approach, which recognises that different groups have different starting points and therefore require differential treatment, appears to offer an appropriate basis for considering how best to redress the vast inequities which exist in post-Apartheid South Africa. Vertical equity principles are applied in critically analysing two areas of recent policy action which are particularly relevant to health sector equity in South Africa, namely public-private sector cross-subsidies and the allocation of government resources between provinces. Despite a strong political commitment to redressing historical inequities, recent government policy actions in these two areas appear to fall short of desirable goals when viewed through a vertical equity lens. In particular, policies since the first democratic elections in 1994 have done little to reduce the extent of government subsidies to the private health sector, which serves a minority of the population. In addition, recent proposals for a Social Health Insurance will allow minimal cross-subsidies between high- and low-income earners and would not adequately redress the currently inequitable public-private cross-subsidies. With respect to the allocation of government resources between provinces, a vertical equity approach would suggest that the most historically dis-advantaged provinces have an even greater claim on government resources than reflected in the current formula, as developed by the Department of Finance. This paper also considers the potential benefits of engaging with societal views in determining what constitutes dis-advantage in the South African context, in order to identify those who should receive priority in resource allocation decisions. It concludes with a review of a number of practical steps that can be taken to draw vertical equity principles into policy action.

Keywords:  Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11186024     DOI: 10.1023/A:1009483700049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Anal        ISSN: 1065-3058


  4 in total

1.  Putting equity in health back onto the social policy agenda: experience from South Africa.

Authors:  Di McIntyre; Lucy Gilson
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  The concepts and principles of equity and health.

Authors:  M Whitehead
Journal:  Int J Health Serv       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.663

Review 3.  "Communitarian claims" as an ethical basis for allocating health care resources.

Authors:  G Mooney
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  And now for vertical equity? Some concerns arising from aboriginal health in Australia.

Authors:  G Mooney
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.046

  4 in total
  8 in total

Review 1.  Clarifying efficiency-equity tradeoffs through explicit criteria, with a focus on developing countries.

Authors:  Chris James; Guy Carrin; William Savedoff; Piya Hanvoravongchai
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2005-03

2.  Ethnic disparities in access to care in post-apartheid South Africa.

Authors:  Zeida R Kon; Nuha Lackan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Stress, substance use and sexual risk behaviors among primary care patients in Cape Town, South Africa.

Authors:  Lyndsay Ammon Avalos; Jennifer R Mertens; Catherine L Ward; Alan J Flisher; Graham F Bresick; Constance M Weisner
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2009-02-10

Review 4.  Strengthening intersectoral collaboration for primary health care in developing countries: can the health sector play broader roles?

Authors:  Omokhoa Adedayo Adeleye; Antoinette Ngozi Ofili
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2010-04-29

5.  Priority setting of health interventions: the need for multi-criteria decision analysis.

Authors:  Rob Baltussen; Louis Niessen
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2006-08-21

Review 6.  Achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA): A Conceptual Review of Normative Economics Frameworks.

Authors:  Michael E Otim; Amina M Almarzouqi; Jean P Mukasa; Wilson Gachiri
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-11-16

7.  Annotated Bibliography on Equity in Health, 1980-2001.

Authors:  James A Macinko; Barbara Starfield
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2002-04-22

8.  Adverse or acceptable: negotiating access to a post-apartheid health care contract.

Authors:  Bronwyn Harris; John Eyles; Loveday Penn-Kekana; Liz Thomas; Jane Goudge
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 4.185

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.