Literature DB >> 11185794

Divided attention during encoding and retrieval: differential control effects?

F I Craik1, M Naveh-Benjamin, G Ishaik, N D Anderson.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that divided attention (DA) during retrieval has little effect on recall of episodic memories, although DA during encoding has a large detrimental effect. One possible reason for this asymmetry is that stimulus presentation at encoding is under experimenter control, whereas retrieval operations and responses are under participant control. This experiment tested this possibility by presenting paired-associate word lists for learning and recall, either at a fixed 4-s rate or at a rate controlled by the participant. The results showed that the higher recall levels for DA at retrieval than for DA at encoding held under all combinations of experimenter and participant control. The implications of these results for a fuller understanding of encoding and retrieval processes are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11185794     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.26.6.1744

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  22 in total

1.  What neural correlates underlie successful encoding and retrieval? A functional magnetic resonance imaging study using a divided attention paradigm.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Kensinger; Richard J Clarke; Suzanne Corkin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  fMRI differences in encoding and retrieval of pictures due to encoding strategy in the elderly.

Authors:  Jennifer L Mandzia; Sandra E Black; Mary Pat McAndrews; Cheryl Grady; Simon Graham
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Item learning in cognitive skill training: effects of item difficulty.

Authors:  William J Hoyer; John Cerella; Serge V Onyper
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-12

4.  Bilingual recognition memory: stronger performance but weaker levels-of-processing effects in the less fluent language.

Authors:  Wendy S Francis; Marisela Gutiérrez
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-04

5.  Effects of aging on transient and sustained successful memory encoding activity.

Authors:  Nancy A Dennis; Sander Daselaar; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2006-08-21       Impact factor: 4.673

6.  Aging memory for pictures: using high-density event-related potentials to understand the effect of aging on the picture superiority effect.

Authors:  Brandon A Ally; Jill D Waring; Ellen H Beth; Joshua D McKeever; William P Milberg; Andrew E Budson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Age-related differences in strategy knowledge updating: blocked testing produces greater improvements in metacognitive accuracy for younger than older adults.

Authors:  Jodi Price; Christopher Hertzog; John Dunlosky
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2008-04-30

8.  The relationship between thought suppression and retrieval-induced forgetting: an analysis of witness memories.

Authors:  Gennaro Pica; Antonio Pierro; Annamaria Giannini
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2014-07-27

9.  Concurrent task effects on memory encoding and retrieval: further support for an asymmetry.

Authors:  Moshe Naveh-Benjamin; Angela Kilb; Tyler Fisher
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-01

10.  Cerebellar-parietal connections underpin phonological storage.

Authors:  Katja Macher; Andreas Böhringer; Arno Villringer; Burkhard Pleger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.