Literature DB >> 11185782

Mutual inhibition in collaborative recall: evidence for a retrieval-based account.

F Finlay1, G J Hitch, P R Meudell.   

Abstract

In Experiment 1 participants gave 3 successive free recalls of items learned either individually or in pairwise collaboration. The first and third recalls were performed individually, the second alone or in collaboration. Collaborative recall led to an inhibitory effect after individual learning but not after collaborative learning, in which partners had similar retrieval strategies. Consistent with a retrieval locus for collaborative inhibition, non-recalled items reappeared in subsequent individual recall. Experiment 2 showed that collaborative inhibition was eliminated when a separate retrieval cue was given for each item. Experiments 2 and 3 also showed that when participants learned items in the same order, their retrieval strategies were more similar and they showed less collaborative inhibition. It is concluded that mutual interference in collaborative recall is due to the mutual disruption of individual retrieval strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11185782     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.26.6.1556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  20 in total

1.  Collaboration in implicit memory: evidence from word-fragment completion and category exemplar generation.

Authors:  Clelia Rossi-Arnaud; Vincenzo Cestari; Valeria Rezende Silva Marques; Giulia Bechi Gabrielli; Pietro Spataro
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-11-26

2.  False memory for associated word lists in individuals and collaborating groups.

Authors:  Ruth H Maki; Arne Weigold; Abbigail Arellano
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-04

3.  Age differences in collaborative memory: the role of retrieval manipulations.

Authors:  Michelle L Meade; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-10

4.  Why two heads apart are better than two heads together: multiple mechanisms underlie the collaborative inhibition effect in memory.

Authors:  Sarah J Barber; Celia B Harris; Suparna Rajaram
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Short-term and long-term collaboration benefits on individual recall in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Helena M Blumen; Yaakov Stern
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-01

6.  Collaborative remembering revisited: Study context access modulates collaborative inhibition and later benefits for individual memory.

Authors:  Magdalena Abel; Karl-Heinz T Bäuml
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-11

7.  Exploring the relationship between retrieval disruption from collaboration and recall.

Authors:  Sarah J Barber; Suparna Rajaram
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2011-07-07

8.  Collaborative memory and part-set cueing impairments: the role of executive depletion in modulating retrieval disruption.

Authors:  Sarah J Barber; Suparna Rajaram
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2011-05

9.  The Collaborative Encoding Deficit is Attenuated with Specific Warnings.

Authors:  Sarah J Barber; Suparna Rajaram; Bavani Paneerselvam
Journal:  J Cogn Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2012-09-11

10.  Learning and Remembering with Others: The Key Role of Retrieval in Shaping Group Recall and Collective Memory.

Authors:  Sarah J Barber; Suparna Rajaram; Ethan B Fox
Journal:  Soc Cogn       Date:  2012
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.