Literature DB >> 11184958

Does length of questionnaire matter? A randomised trial of response rates to a mailed questionnaire.

C Iglesias1, D Torgerson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether length of questionnaire affects response rates.
METHODS: A quasi-randomised trial of women aged 70 years and over in a general practice in England. Three questionnaires of different lengths: a clinical questionnaire (four pages); the same questionnaire plus the EuroQol (five pages); the same questionnaire plus the SF-12 (seven pages). The impact of length on the proportion of returned questionnaires and item completion rates was assessed.
RESULTS: In total, 847 questionnaires were mailed; response rates were 49%, 49% and 40% to the short, medium and long questionnaires, respectively. This difference was statistically significant when the short questionnaire was compared against the longest instrument (9% difference; 95% confidence interval (CI) of difference = 0.3% to 16.6%). Item completion rates for the clinical questionnaire did not differ. Respondents did not differ in age or self-reported health status between the three groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the length of a questionnaire from five to seven pages reduces response rates from women aged 70 years and over. However, lengthening a questionnaire does not seem to affect the quality of responses to questions near the front of the questionnaire.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11184958     DOI: 10.1177/135581960000500406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy        ISSN: 1355-8196


  26 in total

1.  Quality of life of people with venous leg ulcers: a comparison of the discriminative and responsive characteristics of two generic and a disease specific instruments.

Authors:  Cynthia P Iglesias; Yvonne Birks; Elizabeth A Nelson; Elizabeth Scanlon; Nicky A Cullum
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Validation of the Mini-OAKHQOL for use in patients with osteoarthritis in Spain.

Authors:  Marta Gonzalez Sáenz de Tejada; Amaia Bilbao; Carmen Herrera; Lidia García; Cristina Sarasqueta; Antonio Escobar
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Digital teaching tools in sports medicine: A randomized control trial comparing the effectiveness of virtual seminar and virtual fishbowl teaching method in medical students.

Authors:  Stefan Hertling; Doreen Hertling; Georg Matziolis; Ekkehard Schleußner; Franziska Loos; Isabel Graul
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Assessment of post-stroke quality of life in cost-effectiveness studies: the usefulness of the Barthel Index and the EuroQoL-5D.

Authors:  N J A van Exel; W J M Scholte op Reimer; M A Koopmanschap
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Comparison of the short form (SF)-12 health status instrument with the SF-36 in patients with coronary heart disease.

Authors:  J Müller-Nordhorn; S Roll; S N Willich
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 6.  Maximising response to postal questionnaires--a systematic review of randomised trials in health research.

Authors:  Rachel A Nakash; Jane L Hutton; Ellen C Jørstad-Stein; Simon Gates; Sarah E Lamb
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2006-02-23       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 7.  Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.

Authors:  Philip James Edwards; Ian Roberts; Mike J Clarke; Carolyn Diguiseppi; Reinhard Wentz; Irene Kwan; Rachel Cooper; Lambert M Felix; Sarah Pratap
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-07-08

Review 8.  Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials.

Authors:  Valerie C Brueton; Jayne Tierney; Sally Stenning; Seeromanie Harding; Sarah Meredith; Irwin Nazareth; Greta Rait
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-12-03

9.  Telemedicine as a Therapeutic Option in Sports Medicine: Results of a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study among Physicians and Patients in Germany.

Authors:  Stefan Hertling; Franziska Maria Loos; Isabel Graul
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials.

Authors:  Katie Gillies; Anna Kearney; Ciara Keenan; Shaun Treweek; Jemma Hudson; Valerie C Brueton; Thomas Conway; Andrew Hunter; Louise Murphy; Peter J Carr; Greta Rait; Paul Manson; Magaly Aceves-Martins
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.