Literature DB >> 11183627

Clinicians' attitudes to recruitment to randomised trials in cancer care: a qualitative study.

C Langley1, S Gray, S Selley, C Bowie, C Price.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To explore attitudes to and problems experienced with recruitment into randomised trials in cancer care.
METHODS: In-depth semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of 20 hospital clinicians in the South West of England identified from 192 participants in a larger postal survey. Interviews were recorded on audiotape and fully transcribed. Data were analysed by comparing transcripts and describing emergent themes.
RESULTS: Clinicians do not always find it easy to identify key randomised trials in their area of interest. Even when they identify those trials in which they would like to participate, they are not always able to recruit patients. Although recruitment can be hindered by the time and administration involved and the resources needed, the attitudes of clinicians to research in general, the design of randomised trials, clinicians' concerns regarding individual patients and patients' preferences for different treatments also present major barriers. Other factors of concern include the imposition of strict eligibility criteria and the expense and complexity of monitoring and follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Barriers to recruitment depend on the clinicians' individual situations and on a complex combination of factors. Action is needed to promote awareness of randomised trials under way, to ensure that trials address issues of importance, are acceptable to patients and clinicians, and that practical support is provided for participating centres.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11183627     DOI: 10.1177/135581960000500307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy        ISSN: 1355-8196


  12 in total

Review 1.  Increasing participation of minorities in cancer clinical trials: summary of the "Moving Beyond the Barriers" Conference in North Carolina.

Authors:  Nancy Stark; Electra Paskett; Ronny Bell; M Robert Cooper; Elizabeth Walker; Alma Wilson; Cathy Tatum
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.798

2.  Investigator barriers and preferences to conduct clinical drug trials in Finland: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Tuija Keinonen; Tapani Keränen; Timo Klaukka; Veijof Saano; Pauli Ylitalo; Hannes Enlund
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2003-12

3.  Attitudes towards clinical research among cancer trial participants and non-participants: an interview study using a Grounded Theory approach.

Authors:  S M Madsen; S Holm; P Riis
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Understanding the perspectives of recruiters is key to improving randomised controlled trial enrolment: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Nicola Farrar; Daisy Elliott; Catherine Houghton; Marcus Jepson; Nicola Mills; Sangeetha Paramasivan; Lucy Plumb; Julia Wade; Bridget Young; Jenny L Donovan; Leila Rooshenas
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 2.728

5.  Recruitment rates and reasons for community physicians' non-participation in an interdisciplinary intervention study on leg ulceration.

Authors:  Oliver R Herber; Wilfried Schnepp; Monika A Rieger
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  Financial considerations in the conduct of multi-centre randomised controlled trials: evidence from a qualitative study.

Authors:  Claire Snowdon; Diana R Elbourne; Jo Garcia; Marion K Campbell; Vikki A Entwistle; David Francis; Adrian M Grant; Rosemary C Knight; Alison M McDonald; Ian Roberts
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Training recruiters to randomized trials to facilitate recruitment and informed consent by exploring patients' treatment preferences.

Authors:  Nicola Mills; Jane M Blazeby; Freddie C Hamdy; David E Neal; Bruce Campbell; Caroline Wilson; Sangeetha Paramasivan; Jenny L Donovan
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  'It's trying to manage the work': a qualitative evaluation of recruitment processes within a UK multicentre trial.

Authors:  Zoë Christina Skea; Shaun Treweek; Katie Gillies
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Recruitment barriers in a randomized controlled trial from the physicians' perspective: a postal survey.

Authors:  Anne Spaar; Martin Frey; Alexander Turk; Werner Karrer; Milo A Puhan
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-03-02       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Researchers' and clinicians' perceptions of recruiting participants to clinical research: a thematic meta-synthesis.

Authors:  Lisa Newington; Alison Metcalfe
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2014-03-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.