Literature DB >> 1118278

Pleasingness vs interestingness of visual stimuli with controlled complexity: their relationship to looking time as a function of exposure time.

G Smets.   

Abstract

Ss take more time to perceive interesting/displeasing stimuli than uninteresting/pleasing ones. This is consistent with the results of former experiments. However we used a different operationalization of looking time, based on binocular rivalry. Each of six stimulus pairs was presented in a stereoscope. One member of each pair was interesting but displeasing in comparison to the other member. Stimulus complexity was under control. Due to binocular rivalry Ss perceived only one pattern a time. 20 Ss were asked to indicate which pattern they actually saw by pushing two buttons. For each stimulus pair was registered how long each button was pushed during each of six successive minutes. Unlike other operationalizations this one is less dependent on S's determination of what stimulus will be looked at or for how long. It has the advantage that it is bound up more exclusively with relations of similarity and dissimilarity between stimulus elements. It allows manipulation of exposure time in a systematic and continous way. There is no significant interaction between looking and exposure time.

Mesh:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1118278     DOI: 10.2466/pms.1975.40.1.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Mot Skills        ISSN: 0031-5125


  3 in total

1.  High-level binocular rivalry effects.

Authors:  Michal Wolf; Shaul Hochstein
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  Eye-tracking and learning experience: gaze trajectories to better understand the behavior of memorial visitors.

Authors:  Salma Mesmoudi; Stanislas Hommet; Denis Peschanski
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 0.957

3.  Art in time and space: context modulates the relation between art experience and viewing time.

Authors:  David Brieber; Marcos Nadal; Helmut Leder; Raphael Rosenberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.