Literature DB >> 11182344

Does penile size in younger men cause problems in condom use? a prospective measurement of penile dimensions in 111 young and 32 older men.

T Schneider1, H Sperling, G Lümmen, J Syllwasschy, H Rübben.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Young men often complain about problems with condom use, but very little information exists about the influence of men's age on penile dimensions and therefore on possible problems in the use of the most important means of contraception in the young.
METHODS: We performed a prospective measurement of penile dimensions in 111 men,18 to 19 years old (group A), and in 32 men, 40 to 68 years old (group B). We measured penile length and width in the flaccid state and after visual and manual self-stimulation in group A and after intracavernous injection of prostaglandin E(1) in group B.
RESULTS: The mean flaccid length in group A (8.60 cm) and group B (9.22 cm) was significantly different. The mean erect length in group A (14.48 cm) and group B (14.18 cm) was not significantly different. The mean flaccid width at the base was significantly different between group A (3.08 cm) and group B (2.87cm), but the mean flaccid width at the glans was not (group A, 3.02 cm; group B, 3.01 cm). The mean erect width at the base (group A, 3.95 cm; group B, 3.50 cm) and the erect width of the glans (group A, 3.49 cm; group B, 3.32 cm) were significantly different.
CONCLUSIONS: Our assumption that the problems young men experience with condom use may be because of smaller penises could not be proved. To address the problems in condom use in younger men, a larger variety of condom sizes and better information about condom use may be useful.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11182344     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00925-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  8 in total

1.  Elements of morphology: standard terminology for the external genitalia.

Authors:  Raoul C M Hennekam; Judith E Allanson; Leslie G Biesecker; John C Carey; John M Opitz; Eric Vilain
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 2.802

2.  Revitalizing condom-centered HIV prevention strategies.

Authors:  Joshua D O'Neal; Lorree C Berteau
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 5.071

3.  Penile Dimensions of Diabetic and Nondiabetic Men With Erectile Dysfunction: A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Nader Salama
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2015-06-30

Review 4.  Therapeutic strategies for patients with micropenis or penile dysmorphic disorder.

Authors:  Oliver Kayes; Majid Shabbir; David Ralph; Suks Minhas
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Reference range of flaccid and stretched penile lengths of adult males in Baghdad: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Naser S Hussein; Ammar F Abid; Ahmed S Alnuaimi
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2017-01-28

6.  Cosmetic penile enhancement surgery: a 3-year single-centre retrospective clinical evaluation of 355 cases.

Authors:  Alessandro Littara; Roberto Melone; Julio Cesar Morales-Medina; Tommaso Iannitti; Beniamino Palmieri
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Penile Flap Inversion Vaginoplasty in Transgender Women: Contemporary Morbidity and Learning-Curve Analysis From a High-Volume Reconstructive Center.

Authors:  Valentin Maurer; Marian Howaldt; Inga Feldmann; Tim Ludwig; Malte W Vetterlein; Philipp Gild; Sylvia Weis; Phillip Marks; Armin Soave; Christian P Meyer; Margit Fisch; Roland Dahlem; Silke Riechardt
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-02-23

8.  Women's Preferences for Penis Size: A New Research Method Using Selection among 3D Models.

Authors:  Nicole Prause; Jaymie Park; Shannon Leung; Geoffrey Miller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.