P A Heidenreich1, M McClellan. 1. Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To review the trends in treatment and survival for patients with acute myocardial infarction over the last 20 years. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Studies were identified through MEDLINE searches and review of study bibliographies. Additional data were obtained from the Health Care Financing Administration including data from Medicare claims files (part A). Thirty-day mortality rates were calculated using Medicare data and case fatality rates from the National Hospital Discharge Survey. Published meta-analyses were used to determine treatment effects. Published studies were included if they reported the use of therapies for acute myocardial infarction at a population level. Trends in the demographic characteristics of the patients as well as infarct characteristics, medication use, and revascularization were recorded. RESULTS: The use of acute treatments that are known to improve survival among patients with myocardial infarction has increased markedly during the last 20 years, leading to an estimated 9.6% reduction (from 27.0% to 17.4%) in 30-day mortality. After adjusting for potential interactions between therapies, the increase in use of aspirin, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and reperfusion can explain 71% of the decrease in the 30-day age- and sex-adjusted mortality rate from 1975 to 1995. The greatest effect of a given therapy was that of aspirin, which accounted for 34% of the decrease in 30-day mortality, followed by thrombolysis (17%), primary angioplasty (10%), beta-blockers (7%), and ACE inhibitors (3%). If other treatments (such as heparin or nonprimary angioplasty), whose effects on mortality are less certain, are included, up to 90% of the decrease in 30-day mortality can be explained by changes in treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The primary reason for the decrease in early mortality from myocardial infarction during the last 20 years appears to be increased use of effective treatments.
PURPOSE: To review the trends in treatment and survival for patients with acute myocardial infarction over the last 20 years. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Studies were identified through MEDLINE searches and review of study bibliographies. Additional data were obtained from the Health Care Financing Administration including data from Medicare claims files (part A). Thirty-day mortality rates were calculated using Medicare data and case fatality rates from the National Hospital Discharge Survey. Published meta-analyses were used to determine treatment effects. Published studies were included if they reported the use of therapies for acute myocardial infarction at a population level. Trends in the demographic characteristics of the patients as well as infarct characteristics, medication use, and revascularization were recorded. RESULTS: The use of acute treatments that are known to improve survival among patients with myocardial infarction has increased markedly during the last 20 years, leading to an estimated 9.6% reduction (from 27.0% to 17.4%) in 30-day mortality. After adjusting for potential interactions between therapies, the increase in use of aspirin, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and reperfusion can explain 71% of the decrease in the 30-day age- and sex-adjusted mortality rate from 1975 to 1995. The greatest effect of a given therapy was that of aspirin, which accounted for 34% of the decrease in 30-day mortality, followed by thrombolysis (17%), primary angioplasty (10%), beta-blockers (7%), and ACE inhibitors (3%). If other treatments (such as heparin or nonprimary angioplasty), whose effects on mortality are less certain, are included, up to 90% of the decrease in 30-day mortality can be explained by changes in treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The primary reason for the decrease in early mortality from myocardial infarction during the last 20 years appears to be increased use of effective treatments.
Authors: William A Ghali; Cameron R Donaldson; Merril L Knudtson; Steven J Lewis; Colleen J Maxwell; Jack V Tu Journal: CMAJ Date: 2003-07-08 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: S P Johnsen; J Videbaek; L Pedersen; R Steffensen; R Videbaek; T Niemann; T T Nielsen; H T Sørensen Journal: Heart Date: 2005-04-06 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Raghavendra Charan P Makam; Nathaniel Erskine; David D McManus; Darleen Lessard; Joel M Gore; Jorge Yarzebski; Robert J Goldberg Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2016-09-13 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Viola Vaccarino; Saif S Rathore; Nanette K Wenger; Paul D Frederick; Jerome L Abramson; Hal V Barron; Ajay Manhapra; Susmita Mallik; Harlan M Krumholz Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-08-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jared Wasser; Robert J Goldberg; Frederick A Spencer; Jorge Yarzebski; Joel M Gore Journal: Coron Artery Dis Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 1.439
Authors: Miao Wang; Andrew E Moran; Jing Liu; Pamela G Coxson; Paul A Heidenreich; Dongfeng Gu; Jiang He; Lee Goldman; Dong Zhao Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2014-01-14
Authors: Ilene H Zuckerman; Xianghua Yin; Gail B Rattinger; Stephen S Gottlieb; Linda Simoni-Wastila; Sarah A Pierce; Ting-Ying Huang; Rahul Shenolikar; Bruce Stuart Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2012-09-24 Impact factor: 5.562