Literature DB >> 11181659

Understanding the utility of adjuvant systemic therapy for primary breast cancer.

C L Loprinzi1, S D Thomé.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Physicians and patients require quantitative information on the expected benefits of adjuvant therapy for primary breast cancer to make appropriate treatment decisions. To date, there has not been any widely available method for estimating the benefits from adjuvant systemic therapy, in terms of long-term disease-free survival probabilities, in patients with primary breast cancer.
METHODS: Baseline prognostic information for primary breast cancer patients was estimated by asking 11 breast cancer specialists to complete a questionnaire on baseline prognosis and then using mean values. Data on the relative benefits of adjuvant therapy were culled from systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials. A computer algorithm was developed to calculate 10-year absolute outcome data. Results from this evaluation were compared with a previously described actuarial algorithm.
RESULTS: Individual prognostic estimates varied within a group of breast cancer specialists, but mean values of their estimates closely followed published data. Translation of expected benefits of adjuvant therapy from relative to absolute terms was performed with a simple computer algorithm. The data were translated into tabular forms to facilitate user-friendly clinical use.
CONCLUSION: The provided data should facilitate a better understanding of the absolute magnitude of benefit for available systemic adjuvant therapies in individual women with primary breast cancer. This should allow patients to make more informed decisions about their options.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11181659     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.4.972

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  12 in total

1.  Adjuvant chemotherapy for resected stage II and III colon cancer: comparison of two widely used prognostic calculators.

Authors:  Aditya Bardia; Charles Loprinzi; Axel Grothey; Garth Nelson; Steven Alberts; Smitha Menon; Stephan Thome; Sharlene Gill; Dan Sargent
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 2.  Chemotherapy-Associated Peripheral Neuropathy in Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Donna R Rivera; Patricia A Ganz; Meghan S Weyrich; Hanna Bandos; Joy Melnikow
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  A model building exercise of mortality risk for Taiwanese women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Tsai W Chang; Yao L Kuo
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 4.  Biological characterisation of breast cancer by means of PET.

Authors:  Andreas K Buck; Holger Schirrmeister; Torsten Mattfeldt; Sven N Reske
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  Management of hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer.

Authors:  Elaine M Walsh; Karen L Smith; Vered Stearns
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 4.929

6.  Estimating treatment effects for individual patients based on the results of randomised clinical trials.

Authors:  Johannes A N Dorresteijn; Frank L J Visseren; Paul M Ridker; Annemarie M J Wassink; Nina P Paynter; Ewout W Steyerberg; Yolanda van der Graaf; Nancy R Cook
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-10-03

7.  Method for evaluating prediction models that apply the results of randomized trials to individual patients.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Michael W Kattan; Sargent Daniel
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 8.  A review of features in Internet consumer health decision-support tools.

Authors:  Gary Schwitzer
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2002 Apr-Nov       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Prognostic impact of AJCC response criteria for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II/III breast cancer patients: breast cancer subtype analyses.

Authors:  Yaewon Yang; Seock-Ah Im; Bhumsuk Keam; Kyung-Hun Lee; Tae-Yong Kim; Koung Jin Suh; Han Suk Ryu; Hyeong-Gon Moon; Sae-Won Han; Do-Youn Oh; Wonshik Han; Tae-You Kim; In Ae Park; Dong-Young Noh
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Comparison of the Ability of Different Clinical Treatment Scores to Estimate Prognosis in High-Risk Early Breast Cancer Patients: A Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group Study.

Authors:  Flora Stavridi; Konstantine T Kalogeras; Kyriaki Pliarchopoulou; Ralph M Wirtz; Zoi Alexopoulou; Flora Zagouri; Elke Veltrup; Eleni Timotheadou; Helen Gogas; Angelos Koutras; Georgios Lazaridis; Christos Christodoulou; George Pentheroudakis; Apostolos Laskarakis; Petroula Arapantoni-Dadioti; Anna Batistatou; Maria Sotiropoulou; Gerasimos Aravantinos; Pavlos Papakostas; Paris Kosmidis; Dimitrios Pectasides; George Fountzilas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.