Literature DB >> 11181655

Tamoxifen and chemotherapy for axillary node-negative, estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-23.

B Fisher1, S Anderson, E Tan-Chiu, N Wolmark, D L Wickerham, E R Fisher, N V Dimitrov, J N Atkins, N Abramson, S Merajver, E H Romond, C G Kardinal, H R Shibata, R G Margolese, W B Farrar.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Uncertainty about the relative worth of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) and cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/fluorouracil (CMF), as well as doubt about the propriety of giving tamoxifen (TAM) with chemotherapy to patients with estrogen receptor-negative tumors and negative axillary nodes, prompted the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project to initiate the B-23 study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 2,008) were randomly assigned to CMF plus placebo, CMF plus TAM, AC plus placebo, or AC plus TAM. Six cycles of CMF were given for 6 months; four cycles of AC were administered for 63 days. TAM was given daily for 5 years. Relapse-free survival (RFS), event-free survival (EFS), and survival (S) were determined by using life-table estimates. Tests for heterogeneity of outcome used log-rank statistics and Cox proportional hazards models to detect differences across all groups and according to chemotherapy and hormonal therapy status.
RESULTS: No significant difference in RFS, EFS, or S was observed among the four groups through 5 years (P =.96,.8, and.8, respectively), for those aged < or = 49 years (P =.97,.5, and.9, respectively), or for those aged > or = 50 years (P =.7,.6, and.6, respectively). A comparison between all CMF- and all AC-treated patients demonstrated no significant differences in RFS (87% at 5 years in both groups, P =.9), EFS (83% and 82%, P =.6), or S (89% and 90%, P =.4). There were no significant differences in RFS, EFS, or S between CMF and AC in patients aged < or = 49 or > or = 50 years. No significant difference in any outcome was observed when chemotherapy-treated patients who received placebo were compared with those given TAM. RFS in both groups was 87% (P =.6), 87% in patients aged < or = 49 (P =.9), and 88% and 87%, respectively (P =.4), in those aged > or = 50 years.
CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in the outcome of patients who received AC or CMF. TAM with either regimen resulted in no significant advantage over that achieved from chemotherapy alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11181655     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.4.931

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  50 in total

Review 1.  A role for antiangiogenic therapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Marsha A Moses; Jay Harper; Cecilia A Fernández
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Breast Cancer OncoGuia.

Authors:  Paula Manchon; Josep M Borràs; Tàrsila Ferro; Josep Alfons Espinàs
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Recent publications by ochsner authors.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2002

Review 4.  American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline: update on adjuvant endocrine therapy for women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Harold J Burstein; Ann Alexis Prestrud; Jerome Seidenfeld; Holly Anderson; Thomas A Buchholz; Nancy E Davidson; Karen E Gelmon; Sharon H Giordano; Clifford A Hudis; Jennifer Malin; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Diana Rowden; Alexander J Solky; Maryfran R Sowers; Vered Stearns; Eric P Winer; Mark R Somerfield; Jennifer J Griggs
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Time-Varying Effects of Breast Cancer Adjuvant Systemic Therapy.

Authors:  Ismail Jatoi; Hanna Bandos; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; William F Anderson; Edward H Romond; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients with regular follow-up.

Authors:  Renée Simon; Jean Latreille; Claire Matte; Pierre Desjardins; Eric Bergeron
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 7.  The Globalization of Cooperative Groups.

Authors:  Manuel Valdivieso; Benjamin W Corn; Janet E Dancey; D Lawrence Wickerham; L Elise Horvath; Edith A Perez; Alison Urton; Walter M Cronin; Erica Field; Evonne Lackey; Charles D Blanke
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 4.929

8.  Risk of hospitalization according to chemotherapy regimen in early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Carlos H Barcenas; Jiangong Niu; Ning Zhang; Yufeng Zhang; Thomas A Buchholz; Linda S Elting; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Benjamin D Smith; Sharon H Giordano
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  A randomized placebo-controlled study of tamoxifen after adjuvant chemotherapy in premenopausal women with early breast cancer (National Cancer Institute of Canada--Clinical Trials Group Trial, MA.12).

Authors:  V H C Bramwell; K I Pritchard; D Tu; K Tonkin; H Vachhrajani; T A Vandenberg; J Robert; A Arnold; S E O'Reilly; B Graham; L Shepherd
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 10.  Cyclophosphamide and cancer: golden anniversary.

Authors:  Ashkan Emadi; Richard J Jones; Robert A Brodsky
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 66.675

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.