Literature DB >> 11181381

Pharmacodynamics of amphotericin B in a neutropenic-mouse disseminated-candidiasis model.

D Andes1, T Stamsted, R Conklin.   

Abstract

In vivo pharmacodynamic parameters have been described for a variety of antibacterials. These parameters have been studied in correlation with in vivo outcomes in order to determine which dosing parameter is predictive of outcome and the magnitude of that parameter associated with efficacy. Very little is known about pharmacodynamics for antifungal agents. We utilized a neutropenic mouse model of disseminated candidiasis to correlate pharmacodynamic parameters (percent time above MIC [T > MIC], area under the concentration time curve [AUC]/MIC ratio, and peak serum level/MIC ratio) for amphotericin B in vivo with efficacy, as measured by organism number in homogenized kidney cultures after 72 h of therapy. Amphotericin B was administered by the intraperitoneal route. Drug kinetics for amphotericin B in infected mice were nonlinear. Serum half-lives ranged from 13 to 27 h. Infection was achieved by intravenous inoculation with 10(6) CFU of yeast cells per ml via the lateral tail vein of neutropenic mice. Groups of mice were treated with fourfold escalating total doses of amphotericin B ranging from 0.08 to 20 mg/kg of body weight divided into 1, 3, or 6 doses over 72 h. Increasing doses produced concentration-dependent killing, ranging from 0 to 2 log(10) CFU/kidney compared to the organism number at the start of therapy. Amphotericin B also produced prolonged dose-dependent suppression of growth after serum levels had fallen below the MIC. Nonlinear regression analysis was used to determine which pharmacodynamic parameter best correlated with efficacy. Peak serum level in relation to the MIC (peak serum level/MIC ratio) was the parameter best predictive of outcome, while the AUC/MIC ratio and T > MIC were only slightly less predictive (peak serum level/MIC ratio, coefficient of determination [R(2)] = 90 to 93%; AUC/MIC ratio, R(2) = 49 to 69%; T > MIC, R(2) = 67 to 85%). The total amount of drug necessary to achieve various microbiological outcomes over the treatment period was 4.8- to 7.6-fold smaller when the dosing schedule called for large single doses than when the same amount of total drug was administered in 2 to 6 doses. Given the narrow therapeutic window of amphotericin B and frequent treatment failures, these results suggest the need for a reevaluation of current dosing regimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11181381      PMCID: PMC90394          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.3.922-926.2001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  22 in total

Review 1.  Experimental antifungal chemotherapy in granulocytopenic animal models of disseminated candidiasis: approaches to understanding investigational antifungal compounds for patients with neoplastic diseases.

Authors:  T J Walsh; J W Lee; E Roilides; P Francis; J Bacher; C A Lyman; P A Pizzo
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Hospital-acquired candidemia. The attributable mortality and excess length of stay.

Authors:  S B Wey; M Mori; M A Pfaller; R F Woolson; R P Wenzel
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1988-12

3.  Comparative study with enoxacin and netilmicin in a pharmacodynamic model to determine importance of ratio of antibiotic peak concentration to MIC for bactericidal activity and emergence of resistance.

Authors:  J Blaser; B B Stone; M C Groner; S H Zinner
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Detection of amphotericin B-resistant Candida isolates in a broth-based system.

Authors:  J H Rex; C R Cooper; W G Merz; J N Galgiani; E J Anaissie
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Correlation between in vitro and in vivo activity of antifungal agents against Candida species.

Authors:  E J Anaissie; N C Karyotakis; R Hachem; M C Dignani; J H Rex; V Paetznick
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 5.226

6.  Comparison of fluconazole, amphotericin B and flucytosine in treatment of a murine model of disseminated infection with Candida glabrata in immunocompromised mice.

Authors:  B A Atkinson; C Bouthet; R Bocanegra; A Correa; M F Luther; J R Graybill
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  The postantibiotic effect of antifungal agents against common pathogenic yeasts.

Authors:  J D Turnidge; S Gudmundsson; B Vogelman; W A Craig
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.790

8.  Secular trends in nosocomial primary bloodstream infections in the United States, 1980-1989. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System.

Authors:  S N Banerjee; T G Emori; D H Culver; R P Gaynes; W R Jarvis; T Horan; J R Edwards; J Tolson; T Henderson; W J Martone
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1991-09-16       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  In vivo postantibiotic effect in a thigh infection in neutropenic mice.

Authors:  B Vogelman; S Gudmundsson; J Turnidge; J Leggett; W A Craig
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 5.226

10.  Pharmacodynamics of amikacin in vitro and in mouse thigh and lung infections.

Authors:  W A Craig; J Redington; S C Ebert
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 5.790

View more
  51 in total

Review 1.  Antifungal susceptibility testing: practical aspects and current challenges.

Authors:  J H Rex; M A Pfaller; T J Walsh; V Chaturvedi; A Espinel-Ingroff; M A Ghannoum; L L Gosey; F C Odds; M G Rinaldi; D J Sheehan; D W Warnock
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 2.  In vivo pharmacodynamics of antifungal drugs in treatment of candidiasis.

Authors:  David Andes
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  In vivo pharmacodynamics of HMR 3270, a glucan synthase inhibitor, in a murine candidiasis model.

Authors:  D Andes; K Marchillo; J Lowther; A Bryskier; T Stamstad; R Conklin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Antifungal agents: in vitro susceptibility testing, pharmacodynamics, and prospects for combination therapy.

Authors:  A H Groll; H Kolve
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2004-03-11       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Pharmacodynamic activity of amphotericin B deoxycholate is associated with peak plasma concentrations in a neutropenic murine model of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis.

Authors:  Nathan P Wiederhold; Vincent H Tam; Jingduan Chi; Randall A Prince; Dimitrios P Kontoyiannis; Russell E Lewis
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic comparison of amphotericin B (AMB) and two lipid-associated AMB preparations, liposomal AMB and AMB lipid complex, in murine candidiasis models.

Authors:  D Andes; N Safdar; K Marchillo; R Conklin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  Antifungal therapeutic drug monitoring: established and emerging indications.

Authors:  David Andes; Andres Pascual; Oscar Marchetti
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Itraconazole preexposure attenuates the efficacy of subsequent amphotericin B therapy in a murine model of acute invasive pulmonary aspergillosis.

Authors:  Russell E Lewis; Randall A Prince; Jingduan Chi; Dimitrios P Kontoyiannis
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Pharmacodynamics and dose-response relationships of liposomal amphotericin B against different azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus isolates in a murine model of disseminated aspergillosis.

Authors:  Seyedmojtaba Seyedmousavi; Willem J G Melchers; Johan W Mouton; Paul E Verweij
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Pros and Cons of Extrapolating Animal Data on Antifungal Pharmacodynamics to Humans.

Authors:  Scott W Mueller; Tyree H Kiser
Journal:  Curr Fungal Infect Rep       Date:  2011-03-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.