Literature DB >> 11180856

Clinical aspects and perspectives in islet xenotransplantation.

C G Groth1, A Tibell, L Wennberg, W Bennet, T Lundgren, K J Rydgård, S Lundin, E Lindeborg, O Korsgren.   

Abstract

In 1990-1993, eight diabetic renal transplant patients had porcine fetal islets injected intraportally at Huddinge Hospital in Stockholm. Four of the patients had evidence of xenograft function reflected in the excretion of small amounts of porcine C-peptide. Two patients had the porcine fetal islets placed under the capsule of a simultaneously transplanted kidney. In one of these patients, a graft biopsy specimen taken 3 weeks after transplantation revealed morphologically intact epithelial cells staining positively for insulin and glucagon. The insulin production was in all instances insufficient to affect the patient's insulin requirements. All patients formed specific xenoantibodies (mostly anti-Gal); presumably, most of the xenoislets were destroyed by rejection. On follow-up studies carried out 6-8 years after xenotransplantation, most patients still had higher-than-pretransplant levels of xenoantibodies. There was no evidence of transmission of porcine endogeneous retroviruses to the patients. All patients expressed a positive attitude toward the use of animal tissue for treatment of disease, and none of the patients regretted participating in the trial. Cell transplantation is leading the way at present for clinical xenotransplantation. The finding that complement inhibition protects intraportally injected porcine islets from an injurious incompatibility reaction holds promise for future clinical application. A similar protective effect might be achievable with the use of islets from transgenic pigs expressing human complement receptors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11180856     DOI: 10.1007/s005340070030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg        ISSN: 0944-1166


  3 in total

1.  Large animal models are critical for rationally advancing regenerative therapies.

Authors:  Dustin R Wakeman; Andrew M Crain; Evan Y Snyder
Journal:  Regen Med       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.806

Review 2.  Is sensitization to pig antigens detrimental to subsequent allotransplantation?

Authors:  Qi Li; Hidetaka Hara; Zhongqiang Zhang; Michael E Breimer; Yi Wang; David K C Cooper
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2018-04-14       Impact factor: 3.907

Review 3.  Pancreas and islet cell transplantation.

Authors:  Rita Bottino; Massimo Trucco; A N Balamurugan; Thomas E Starzl
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.043

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.