OBJECTIVE: To investigate the response of residential homes to four specific health problems of residents and the relationship between the quality of this response and the prevalence of depression. DESIGN AND SAMPLE: Post hoc analysis of data collected for a cross-sectional survey of homes chosen to represent "excellent" and "standard" care; resident sample sufficient to detect difference between 20% and 40% depression prevalence between two groups of homes (90% power, 5% significance). Three hundred and nine residents were assessed. SETTING: Seventeen residential homes in different areas of England. METHODS: Data were collected about aspects of the care provided, including quality rating of care plans. Standard instruments were used to collect resident data by direct and informant interviews, including assessments of dementia, depression, dependency, medication and specific health problems. RESULTS: Seventy-nine per cent of the sample were suffering from dementia; 40% of 194 residents who could be assessed for depression were depressed. Of residents assessed by research nurses, 72% had problems with mobility, 67% with stability, 40% with hearing and 46% with vision. Quality of response to these problems was variable. In a combined assessment of care plan quality and key worker awareness, 7% of homes' responses to these four problems in residents were rated as good. Seventeen per cent of depressed residents were so identified by their key workers. Good interventions by key workers were associated with less depression in residents. DISCUSSION: The response of home staff and community health professionals to physical health needs in residential homes is variable and should be improved. This study suggests that improving this aspect of care provision might reduce depression and thus improve quality of life. Copyright 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the response of residential homes to four specific health problems of residents and the relationship between the quality of this response and the prevalence of depression. DESIGN AND SAMPLE: Post hoc analysis of data collected for a cross-sectional survey of homes chosen to represent "excellent" and "standard" care; resident sample sufficient to detect difference between 20% and 40% depression prevalence between two groups of homes (90% power, 5% significance). Three hundred and nine residents were assessed. SETTING: Seventeen residential homes in different areas of England. METHODS: Data were collected about aspects of the care provided, including quality rating of care plans. Standard instruments were used to collect resident data by direct and informant interviews, including assessments of dementia, depression, dependency, medication and specific health problems. RESULTS: Seventy-nine per cent of the sample were suffering from dementia; 40% of 194 residents who could be assessed for depression were depressed. Of residents assessed by research nurses, 72% had problems with mobility, 67% with stability, 40% with hearing and 46% with vision. Quality of response to these problems was variable. In a combined assessment of care plan quality and key worker awareness, 7% of homes' responses to these four problems in residents were rated as good. Seventeen per cent of depressed residents were so identified by their key workers. Good interventions by key workers were associated with less depression in residents. DISCUSSION: The response of home staff and community health professionals to physical health needs in residential homes is variable and should be improved. This study suggests that improving this aspect of care provision might reduce depression and thus improve quality of life. Copyright 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Authors: Christopher D Beer; Barbara Horner; Osvaldo P Almeida; Samuel Scherer; Nicola T Lautenschlager; Nick Bretland; Penelope Flett; Frank Schaper; Leon Flicker Journal: Trials Date: 2010-05-26 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Fiona Höbler; Katherine S McGilton; Walter Wittich; Kate Dupuis; Marilyn Reed; Shirley Dumassais; Paul Mick; M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2021 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Claire Goodman; Tom Dening; Adam L Gordon; Susan L Davies; Julienne Meyer; Finbarr C Martin; John R F Gladman; Clive Bowman; Christina Victor; Melanie Handley; Heather Gage; Steve Iliffe; Maria Zubair Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2016-07-16 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Fiona E Matthews; Holly Bennett; Raphael Wittenberg; Carol Jagger; Tom Dening; Carol Brayne Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-09-02 Impact factor: 3.240