Literature DB >> 11180419

Procedural justice in the context of civil commitment: an analogue study.

M Cascardi1, N G Poythress, A Hall.   

Abstract

Procedural justice theory posits that the process by which disputes are resolved influences perceptions of fairness and satisfaction with outcomes, even if the outcomes are unfavorable. Within the context of civil commitment, Tyler (1992) has suggested that enhancing respondents' perceptions of procedural justice (i.e., participation, dignity, and trust) during commitment proceedings might facilitate accommodation to an adverse judicial determination (i.e., commitment) and subsequently enhance therapeutic outcomes. The study reported here used videotapes of mock commitment hearings to examine whether patients committed for involuntary treatment are sensitive to procedural justice manipulations. Results suggest that patients are sensitive to procedural justice manipulations and, further, that such manipulations are likely to influence the patients' attitude toward psychiatric care. These findings suggest that the development of strategies to enhance patients' perceptions of procedural justice in commitment hearings may indeed have positive therapeutic implications and warrants further investigation. Copyright 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11180419     DOI: 10.1002/bsl.421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Sci Law        ISSN: 0735-3936


  10 in total

1.  Comparing views on civil commitment for drug misuse and for mental illness among persons with opioid use disorder.

Authors:  Paul P Christopher; Bradley Anderson; Michael D Stein
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2020-03-05

2.  Children's Decision-Making Involvement About Research Participation: Associations With Perceived Fairness and Self-Efficacy.

Authors:  Victoria A Miller; Chris Feudtner; Abbas F Jawad
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 1.742

3.  What influences perceptions of procedural justice among people with mental illness regarding their interactions with the police?

Authors:  James D Livingston; Sarah L Desmarais; Caroline Greaves; Richard Parent; Simon Verdun-Jones; Johann Brink
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2013-01-05

4.  The Role of Kinship and Siblings in Young Children's Placement Preferences.

Authors:  Kelli L Dickerson; Thomas D Lyon; Jodi A Quas
Journal:  J Interpers Violence       Date:  2019-06-16

5.  Procedural justice in mental health courts: judicial practices, participant perceptions, and outcomes related to mental health recovery.

Authors:  Sarah Kopelovich; Philip Yanos; Christina Pratt; Joshua Koerner
Journal:  Int J Law Psychiatry       Date:  2013-02-12

6.  Experiences of Autism Spectrum Disorder and Policing in England and Wales: Surveying Police and the Autism Community.

Authors:  Laura Crane; Katie L Maras; Tamsyn Hawken; Sue Mulcahy; Amina Memon
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2016-06

7.  Predictors of Criminal Justice Outcomes Among Mental Health Courts Participants: The Role of Perceived Coercion and Subjective Mental Health Recovery.

Authors:  Christina Pratt; Philip T Yanos; Sarah L Kopelovich; Joshua Koerner; Mary Jane Alexander
Journal:  Int J Forensic Ment Health       Date:  2013-04-01

8.  Civil commitment experiences among opioid users.

Authors:  Paul P Christopher; Bradley Anderson; Michael D Stein
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 4.492

9.  Working alliance, interpersonal trust and perceived coercion in mental health review hearings.

Authors:  Vidis Donnelly; Aideen Lynch; Damian Mohan; Harry G Kennedy
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Syst       Date:  2011-11-10

10.  Engaging Caregivers and Providers of Children With Sickle Cell Anemia in Shared Decision Making for Hydroxyurea: Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Anna M Hood; Heather Strong; Cara Nwankwo; Yolanda Johnson; James Peugh; Constance A Mara; Lisa M Shook; William B Brinkman; Francis J Real; Melissa D Klein; Rogelle Hackworth; Sherif M Badawy; Alexis A Thompson; Jean L Raphael; Amber M Yates; Kim Smith-Whitley; Allison A King; Cecelia Calhoun; Susan E Creary; Connie M Piccone; Aimee K Hildenbrand; Steven K Reader; Lynne Neumayr; Emily R Meier; Amy E Sobota; Sohail Rana; Maria Britto; Kay L Saving; Marsha Treadwell; Charles T Quinn; Russell E Ware; Lori E Crosby
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2021-05-21
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.