Literature DB >> 11177617

Oculomanual Coordination in Tracking of Pseudorandom Target Motion Stimuli.

Ruiping Xia1, Graham Barnes.   

Abstract

Oculomanual coordination was investigated in 9 healthy subjects during tracking of pseudorandom motion stimuli. Each subject was required to track visual stimuli under eye-hand (EH) and eye-alone (EA) conditions. Subjects were exposed to 3 types of mixed sinusoidal stimulus with varying frequency or amplitude of the highest frequency component, or various degrees of irregularity. Progressive degradation in tracking performance was nonlinearly induced by an increase in either (a) the highest frequency component or (b) its amplitude, but not by stimulus irregularity. No significant difference was found in eye velocity gain and phase under the EH and EA conditions. Eye and hand responses were found to be highly correlated in gain and phase when compared across frequencies and motion stimuli. The results suggest that frequency and amplitude are dominant factors controlling the breakdown of oculomanual performance in response to pseudorandom stimuli. Frequency responses of smooth pursuit eye movements are not affected by the hand motion in pursuit of unpredictable stimuli. Eye and hand motor systems appear to share common nonlinear drive mechanisms when pursuing pseudorandom target motion stimuli.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 11177617     DOI: 10.1080/00222899909601889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  8 in total

1.  Anticipatory control of hand and eye movements in humans during oculo-manual tracking.

Authors:  G R Barnes; J F Marsden
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Manual tracking enhances smooth pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Diederick C Niehorster; Wilfred W F Siu; Li Li
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  The saccadic component of ocular pursuit is influenced by the predictability of the target motion in humans.

Authors:  Claire Boudet; Marie-Laure Bocca; Sonia Dollfus; Pierre Denise
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The influence of cues and stimulus history on the non-linear frequency characteristics of the pursuit response to randomized target motion.

Authors:  Graham R Barnes; C J Sue Collins
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Sex differences in visuomotor tracking.

Authors:  James Mathew; Guillaume S Masson; Frederic R Danion
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Saccade reaction time asymmetries during task-switching in pursuit tracking.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Bieg; Jean-Pierre Bresciani; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Lewis L Chuang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-08-10       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Biases in the perception of self-motion during whole-body acceleration and deceleration.

Authors:  Luc Tremblay; Andrew Kennedy; Dany Paleressompoulle; Liliane Borel; Laurence Mouchnino; Jean Blouin
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-16

8.  Different gaze strategies during eye versus hand tracking of a moving target.

Authors:  Frederic R Danion; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.