BACKGROUND: Despite demonstrated benefits, intensive insulin therapy has not gained widespread clinical acceptance for several reasons: Multiple daily injections are inconvenient, adherence is a concern, and the time-activity profile may not mimic normal insulin secretion. As such, alternate means of administering insulin are being evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of pulmonary delivery of insulin in type 2 diabetic patients who require insulin. DESIGN: Randomized, open-label, 3-month study consisting of a screening visit, a 4-week baseline lead-in phase, and a 12-week treatment phase. SETTING: General clinical research center and outpatient research clinics. PATIENTS: 26 patients (16 men, 10 women) with type 2 diabetes (average age, 51.1 years; average duration of diabetes, 11.2 years). INTERVENTION: Patients received inhaled insulin before each meal plus a bedtime injection of ultralente insulin, performed home glucose monitoring, and had weekly adjustment of insulin dose; target level for preprandial plasma glucose was 5.55 to 8.88 mmol/L (100 to 160 mg/dL). MEASUREMENTS: Glycemic control (hemoglobin A(1c) level) obtained at baseline and monthly for 3 months. Pulmonary function tests were done at baseline and at the end of the study. RESULTS: Inhaled insulin treatment for 3 months significantly improved glycemic control compared with baseline: Mean hemoglobin A(1c) levels decreased by 0.0071 +/- 0.0072 (0.71% +/- 0.72%). Patients experienced an average of 0.83 mild to moderate hypoglycemic event per month; no severe events were recorded. Patients showed no significant weight gain or change in pulmonary function compared with baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary delivery of insulin in type 2 diabetic patients who require insulin improved glycemic control, was well tolerated, and demonstrated no adverse pulmonary effects. Larger-scale studies are ongoing to provide long-term efficacy and safety data.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Despite demonstrated benefits, intensive insulin therapy has not gained widespread clinical acceptance for several reasons: Multiple daily injections are inconvenient, adherence is a concern, and the time-activity profile may not mimic normal insulin secretion. As such, alternate means of administering insulin are being evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of pulmonary delivery of insulin in type 2 diabeticpatients who require insulin. DESIGN: Randomized, open-label, 3-month study consisting of a screening visit, a 4-week baseline lead-in phase, and a 12-week treatment phase. SETTING: General clinical research center and outpatient research clinics. PATIENTS: 26 patients (16 men, 10 women) with type 2 diabetes (average age, 51.1 years; average duration of diabetes, 11.2 years). INTERVENTION: Patients received inhaled insulin before each meal plus a bedtime injection of ultralente insulin, performed home glucose monitoring, and had weekly adjustment of insulin dose; target level for preprandial plasma glucose was 5.55 to 8.88 mmol/L (100 to 160 mg/dL). MEASUREMENTS: Glycemic control (hemoglobin A(1c) level) obtained at baseline and monthly for 3 months. Pulmonary function tests were done at baseline and at the end of the study. RESULTS: Inhaled insulin treatment for 3 months significantly improved glycemic control compared with baseline: Mean hemoglobin A(1c) levels decreased by 0.0071 +/- 0.0072 (0.71% +/- 0.72%). Patients experienced an average of 0.83 mild to moderate hypoglycemic event per month; no severe events were recorded. Patients showed no significant weight gain or change in pulmonary function compared with baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary delivery of insulin in type 2 diabeticpatients who require insulin improved glycemic control, was well tolerated, and demonstrated no adverse pulmonary effects. Larger-scale studies are ongoing to provide long-term efficacy and safety data.
Authors: Nick Freemantle; Lawrence Blonde; Bjorn Bolinder; Robert A Gerber; F D Richard Hobbs; Luc Martinez; Stuart Ross Journal: Pharmacoeconomics Date: 2005 Impact factor: 4.981
Authors: Camila Guimarães; Carlo A Marra; Sabrina Gill; Graydon Meneilly; Scot Simpson; Ana Lpc Godoy; Maria Cristina Foss de; Regina Hc Queiroz; Larry Lynd Journal: Patient Prefer Adherence Date: 2010-07-21 Impact factor: 2.711