CONTEXT: Some epidemiologic studies suggest that elevated fruit and vegetable consumption is associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer. However, most have been case-control studies in which recall and selection bias may influence the results. Additionally, publication bias may have influenced the literature on associations for specific fruit and vegetable subgroups. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between breast cancer and total and specific fruit and vegetable group intakes using standardized exposure definitions. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SELECTION: Eight prospective studies that had at least 200 incident breast cancer cases, assessed usual dietary intake, and completed a validation study of the diet assessment method or a closely related instrument were included in these analyses. DATA EXTRACTION: Using the primary data from each of the studies, we calculated study-specific relative risks (RRs) that were combined using a random-effects model. DATA SYNTHESIS: The studies included 7377 incident invasive breast cancer cases occurring among 351 825 women whose diet was analyzed at baseline. For comparisons of the highest vs lowest quartiles of intake, weak, nonsignificant associations were observed for total fruits (pooled multivariate RR, 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86-1.00; P for trend =.08), total vegetables (RR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.89-1.04; P for trend =.54), and total fruits and vegetables (RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.86-1.00; P for trend =.12). No additional benefit was apparent in comparisons of the highest and lowest deciles of intake. No associations were observed for green leafy vegetables, 8 botanical groups, and 17 specific fruits and vegetables. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that fruit and vegetable consumption during adulthood is not significantly associated with reduced breast cancer risk.
CONTEXT: Some epidemiologic studies suggest that elevated fruit and vegetable consumption is associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer. However, most have been case-control studies in which recall and selection bias may influence the results. Additionally, publication bias may have influenced the literature on associations for specific fruit and vegetable subgroups. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between breast cancer and total and specific fruit and vegetable group intakes using standardized exposure definitions. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SELECTION: Eight prospective studies that had at least 200 incident breast cancer cases, assessed usual dietary intake, and completed a validation study of the diet assessment method or a closely related instrument were included in these analyses. DATA EXTRACTION: Using the primary data from each of the studies, we calculated study-specific relative risks (RRs) that were combined using a random-effects model. DATA SYNTHESIS: The studies included 7377 incident invasive breast cancer cases occurring among 351 825 women whose diet was analyzed at baseline. For comparisons of the highest vs lowest quartiles of intake, weak, nonsignificant associations were observed for total fruits (pooled multivariate RR, 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86-1.00; P for trend =.08), total vegetables (RR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.89-1.04; P for trend =.54), and total fruits and vegetables (RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.86-1.00; P for trend =.12). No additional benefit was apparent in comparisons of the highest and lowest deciles of intake. No associations were observed for green leafy vegetables, 8 botanical groups, and 17 specific fruits and vegetables. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that fruit and vegetable consumption during adulthood is not significantly associated with reduced breast cancer risk.
Authors: Stephanie M Tortorella; Simon G Royce; Paul V Licciardi; Tom C Karagiannis Journal: Antioxid Redox Signal Date: 2014-12-19 Impact factor: 8.401
Authors: Natalia Tumas; Camila Niclis; Laura R Aballay; Alberto R Osella; María del Pilar Díaz Journal: Eur J Nutr Date: 2013-08-02 Impact factor: 5.614
Authors: Jennifer Irvin Vidrine; Diana W Stewart; Stephen C Stuyck; Jo Ann Ward; Amanda K Brown; Courtenay Smith; David W Wetter Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Julia S Sisti; Sara Lindström; Peter Kraft; Rulla M Tamimi; Bernard A Rosner; Tianying Wu; Walter C Willett; A Heather Eliassen Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2015-04-28 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: A Heather Eliassen; Sara J Hendrickson; Louise A Brinton; Julie E Buring; Hannia Campos; Qi Dai; Joanne F Dorgan; Adrian A Franke; Yu-tang Gao; Marc T Goodman; Göran Hallmans; Kathy J Helzlsouer; Judy Hoffman-Bolton; Kerstin Hultén; Howard D Sesso; Anne L Sowell; Rulla M Tamimi; Paolo Toniolo; Lynne R Wilkens; Anna Winkvist; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Wei Zheng; Susan E Hankinson Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2012-12-06 Impact factor: 13.506