Literature DB >> 11176811

Effect of improved glycemic control on health care costs and utilization.

E H Wagner1, N Sandhu, K M Newton, D K McCulloch, S D Ramsey, L C Grothaus.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Because of the additional costs associated with improving diabetes management, there is interest in whether improved glycemic control leads to reductions in health care costs, and, if so, when such cost savings occur.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether sustained improvements in hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) levels among diabetic patients are followed by reductions in health care utilization and costs. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Historical cohort study conducted in 1992-1997 in a staff-model health maintenance organization (HMO) in western Washington State. PARTICIPANTS: All diabetic patients aged 18 years or older who were continuously enrolled between January 1992 and March 1996 and had HbA(1c) measured at least once per year in 1992-1994 (n = 4744). Patients whose HbA(1c) decreased 1% or more between 1992 and 1993 and sustained the decline through 1994 were considered to be improved (n = 732). All others were classified as unimproved (n = 4012). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total health care costs, percentage hospitalized, and number of primary care and specialty visits among the improved vs unimproved cohorts in 1992-1997.
RESULTS: Diabetic patients whose HbA(1c) measurements improved were similar demographically to those whose levels did not improve but had higher baseline HbA(1c) measurements (10.0% vs 7.7%; P<.001). Mean total health care costs were $685 to $950 less each year in the improved cohort for 1994 (P =.09), 1995 (P =.003), 1996 (P =.002), and 1997 (P =.01). Cost savings in the improved cohort were statistically significant only among those with the highest baseline HbA(1c) levels (>/=10%) for these years but appeared to be unaffected by presence of complications at baseline. Beginning in the year following improvement (1994), utilization was consistently lower in the improved cohort, reaching statistical significance for primary care visits in 1994 (P =.001), 1995 (P<.001), 1996 (P =.005), and 1997 (P =.004) and for specialty visits in 1997 (P =.02). Differences in hospitalization rates were not statistically significant in any year.
CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that a sustained reduction in HbA(1c) level among adult diabetic patients is associated with significant cost savings within 1 to 2 years of improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11176811     DOI: 10.1001/jama.285.2.182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  103 in total

1.  A guideline for the use of pharmacoeconomic models of diabetes treatment in the US managed-care environment.

Authors:  David L Veenstra; Scott D Ramsey; Sean D Sullivan
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Impact of bariatric surgery on health care utilization and costs among patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Sara N Bleich; Hsien-Yen Chang; Bryan Lau; Kimberly Steele; Jeanne M Clark; Thomas Richards; Jonathan P Weiner; Albert W Wu; Jodi B Segal
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  A proposal for electronic medical records in U.S. primary care.

Authors:  David W Bates; Mark Ebell; Edward Gotlieb; John Zapp; H C Mullins
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  The role of technology and the chronic care model.

Authors:  Linda M Siminerio
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-03-01

5.  Randomized Trial of a Lifestyle Intervention for Urban Low-Income African Americans with Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Lynch; Laurin Mack; Elizabeth Avery; Yamin Wang; Rebecca Dawar; DeJuran Richardson; Kathryn Keim; Jennifer Ventrelle; Bradley M Appelhans; Bettina Tahsin; Leon Fogelfeld
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Simulating the real world of antihyperglycaemic therapies in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Amanda I Adler
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Does literacy mediate the relationship between education and health outcomes? A study of a low-income population with diabetes.

Authors:  Dean Schillinger; Lauren R Barton; Andrew J Karter; Frances Wang; Nancy Adler
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

8.  Engaging physicians in risk factor reduction.

Authors:  James V Springrose; Felix Friedman; Stephen A Gumnit; Eric J Schmidt
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.459

Review 9.  Disease management: panacea, another false hope, or something in between?

Authors:  John P Geyman
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 10.  The Case for Diabetes Population Health Improvement: Evidence-Based Programming for Population Outcomes in Diabetes.

Authors:  Sherita Hill Golden; Nisa Maruthur; Nestoras Mathioudakis; Elias Spanakis; Daniel Rubin; Mihail Zilbermint; Felicia Hill-Briggs
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.810

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.