Literature DB >> 11176641

Distraction osteogenesis of the craniofacial skeleton.

A K Gosain1.   

Abstract

In summary, distraction osteogenesis is a safe and effective means of achieving bone lengthening. These techniques were originally applied to the long bones of the extremities; over the past 10 years they have been effectively applied to the bones of the craniofacial skeleton. The new bone regenerate that is observed after distraction osteogenesis is stable, and relapse rates after skeletal advancement are believed to be lower than with conventional osteotomy and bone graft techniques. There is considerable variability in distraction protocols employed in clinical practice, including differences in the types of devices used and in the rate, rhythm, latency, and period of consolidation for distraction osteogenesis. The greatest application for distraction osteogenesis in the craniofacial skeleton has been with mandible lengthening, for which there is presently a 10-year clinical experience. Midfacial advancement is a newer application of distraction osteogenesis, for which clinical experience has been accrued over the past 5 years. This latter experience indicates that distraction osteogenesis is a viable treatment option for lengthening of the hypoplastic mandible and midface. These techniques have advantages over conventional means of bone graft and rigid fixation because of the quality of the bone regenerate, the decrease in the long-term relapse rate of the advanced bone segments in both the mandible and the midface, and the simultaneous soft-tissue elongation that accompanies the distraction process. Distraction osteogenesis is particularly applicable to the correction of severe deformities of the mandible and midface in children with developmental hypoplasia and syndromic craniosynostosis. However, growth is an added variable in this patient population. The amount of overcorrection in lengthening of the hypoplastic bone required to compensate for continued growth discrepancy of the adjacent facial bones is difficult to predict. Therefore, the families of these patients should be informed that many children will require repeated operations at a later age as they reach skeletal maturity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11176641     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200101000-00050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  8 in total

1.  Physiology of bone turnover and its application in contemporary maxillofacial surgery. A review.

Authors:  Ch Iliopoulos; L Zouloumis; M Lazaridou
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 0.471

2.  Distraction vs remodeling surgery for craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Seong-Woong Kim; Kyu-Won Shim; Nick Plesnila; Yong-Oock Kim; Joong-Uhn Choi; Dong-Seok Kim
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  An Update on Midface Advancement Using Le Fort II and III Distraction Osteogenesis.

Authors:  Youssef Tahiri; Jesse Taylor
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.314

4.  Regenerate healing outcomes in unilateral mandibular distraction osteogenesis using quantitative histomorphometry.

Authors:  Daniel A Schwarz; Krikor G Arman; Mehreen S Kakwan; Ameen M Jamali; Ayman A Elmeligy; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Buccal Fat Pad-Derived Stem Cells for Repair of Maxillofacial Bony Defects.

Authors:  Mitsu Meshram; Sonal Anchlia; Harsh Shah; Siddharth Vyas; Jigar Dhuvad; Lalit Sagarka
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2018-03-29

6.  A bibliometric analysis of research on craniomaxillofacial distraction osteogenesis from 2000 to 2021.

Authors:  Zhen Liu; Jianying Yang; Changhan Zhou; Yao Liu; En Luo
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-08-01

7.  Monoblock craniofacial internal distraction in a child with Pfeiffer syndrome: a case report.

Authors:  Jaiho Chung; Dong Ha Park; Soo Han Yoon
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.153

8.  Correction of Mandibular Retrognathia and Laterognathia by Distraction Osteogenesis: Follow up of 5 cases.

Authors:  Dogan Dolanmaz; Ali Ihya Karaman; Hakan Gurcan Gurel; Abdullah Kalayci; Hasan Kucukkolbasi; Serdar Usumez
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2009-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.