Literature DB >> 11176620

The Internet as a source of information on breast augmentation.

J B Gordon1, L R Barot, A L Fahey, M S Matthews.   

Abstract

The Internet was evaluated as a source of information for the layperson on the topic of breast augmentation. Three commonly used search engines (Excite, AOL, and Yahoo) were employed using the term "breast augmentation." These sites were then evaluated by each of three experienced plastic surgeons for their quality and content. Separately, 17 health Web sites were identified as authoritative by means of recommendation in lay publications. Each "supersite" was accessed, and its search engine was used. The top 10 hits for "breast augmentation" on each site were then evaluated by the senior author for content (Matthews). We found the majority of sites identified by the general search engines (AOL, Excite, Yahoo) to be physician Web sites. Forty-one unique sites were found that applied to the topic. Four of the "hits" did not actually apply to the topic. In general, the applicable Web sites contained limited but accurate procedural details and offered an interactive forum, most commonly email responses. Photographic documentation was given in less than half the sites reviewed, and most of the results shown were only "good" outcomes. Most sites did not discuss any complications of surgical procedures, but those that did were usually accurate. Eighty-three percent of the sites were biased toward a particular surgical technique. The reviewers believe that only about 15 percent of the sites were acceptable to recommend to their patients. The senior author accessed 17 Web sites that are considered authoritative health information Web sites. Each of these sites was searched for information on breast augmentation by means of its internal search engine. Only 29 percent (5 of 17) had any information in their top 10 hits. Three sites had only chat transcripts. One site had limited but accurate information with a link to the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, and one site had scientific information on product safety. No site met the criteria of accurate, complete information on the surgical procedure of breast augmentation. This study demonstrates that it is difficult for the average layperson to get authoritative information quickly and easily on at least one aspect of cosmetic surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11176620     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200101000-00028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  18 in total

1.  Descriptions of Web sites in search listings: a potential obstacle to informed choice of health information.

Authors:  Michael D Slater; Donald E Zimmerman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  A comparison of cigarette- and hookah-related videos on YouTube.

Authors:  Mary V Carroll; Ariel Shensa; Brian A Primack
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  U.S. hookah tobacco smoking establishments advertised on the internet.

Authors:  Brian A Primack; Kristen R Rice; Ariel Shensa; Mary V Carroll; Erica J DePenna; Rima Nakkash; Tracey E Barnett
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Patient education and decision making in breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Lior Heller; Michael J Miller
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.314

5.  Portrayal of alcohol intoxication on YouTube.

Authors:  Brian A Primack; Jason B Colditz; Kevin C Pang; Kristina M Jackson
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 6.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis on in vitro fertilization clinic websites: presentations of risks, benefits and other information.

Authors:  Robert Klitzman; Beata Zolovska; William Folberth; Mark V Sauer; Wendy Chung; Paul Appelbaum
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Nip, tuck and click: medical tourism and the emergence of web-based health information.

Authors:  Neil Lunt; Mariann Hardey; Russell Mannion
Journal:  Open Med Inform J       Date:  2010-02-12

8.  Readability of ASPS and ASAPS educational web sites: an analysis of consumer impact.

Authors:  Oluseyi Aliu; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  What is the quality of information about bariatric surgery on the internet?

Authors:  B Makar; D Quilliot; R Zarnegar; T Levan; A Ayav; L Bresler; P Boissel; L Brunaud
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  Computer-based learning module and the educational process for women with breast cancer who desire reconstruction.

Authors:  Albert Losken
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.