H W Herr1, S M Donat, D F Bajorin. 1. Department of Urology and Genitourinary Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Medical College, Cornell University, New York, New York, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We update our experience with post-chemotherapy surgery in patients with unresectable or lymph node positive bladder cancer. METHODS: Of 207 patients with unresectable or regionally metastatic bladder cancer 80 (39%) underwent post-chemotherapy surgery after treatment with a cisplatin based chemotherapy regimen. We assessed the impact of surgery on achieving a complete response to chemotherapy and on relapse-free survival. RESULTS: No viable cancer was present at post-chemotherapy surgery in 24 of the 80 cases (30%), pathologically confirming a complete response to chemotherapy. Of the 24 patients 14 (58%) survived 9 months to 5 years. Residual viable cancer was completely resected in 49 patients (61%), resulting in a complete response to chemotherapy plus surgery, and 20 (41%) survived. Post-chemotherapy surgery did not benefit those who failed to achieve a major complete or partial response to chemotherapy. Only 1 of the 12 patients (8%) who refused surgery remains alive. CONCLUSIONS: Post-chemotherapy surgical resection of residual cancer may result in disease-free survival in some patients who would otherwise die of disease. Optimal candidates include those in whom the pre-chemotherapy sites of disease are restricted to the bladder and pelvis or regional lymph nodes, and who have a major response to chemotherapy.
PURPOSE: We update our experience with post-chemotherapy surgery in patients with unresectable or lymph node positive bladder cancer. METHODS: Of 207 patients with unresectable or regionally metastatic bladder cancer 80 (39%) underwent post-chemotherapy surgery after treatment with a cisplatin based chemotherapy regimen. We assessed the impact of surgery on achieving a complete response to chemotherapy and on relapse-free survival. RESULTS: No viable cancer was present at post-chemotherapy surgery in 24 of the 80 cases (30%), pathologically confirming a complete response to chemotherapy. Of the 24 patients 14 (58%) survived 9 months to 5 years. Residual viable cancer was completely resected in 49 patients (61%), resulting in a complete response to chemotherapy plus surgery, and 20 (41%) survived. Post-chemotherapy surgery did not benefit those who failed to achieve a major complete or partial response to chemotherapy. Only 1 of the 12 patients (8%) who refused surgery remains alive. CONCLUSIONS: Post-chemotherapy surgical resection of residual cancer may result in disease-free survival in some patients who would otherwise die of disease. Optimal candidates include those in whom the pre-chemotherapy sites of disease are restricted to the bladder and pelvis or regional lymph nodes, and who have a major response to chemotherapy.
Authors: Peter C Black; Colin P N Dinney; Gordon A Brown; Wassim Kassouf; Arlene O Siefker-Radtke; Mark F Munsell; H Barton Grossman; Ashish M Kamat Journal: Urol Oncol Date: 2010-04-24 Impact factor: 3.498
Authors: Joseph R Zabell; Oluwakayode Adejoro; Stephanie L Jarosek; Sean P Elliott; Badrinath R Konety Journal: World J Urol Date: 2016-02-25 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Mark Warren; Michael Kolinsky; Christina M Canil; Piotr Czaykowski; Srikala S Sridhar; Peter C Black; Christopher M Booth; Wassim Kassouf; Libni Eapen; Som D Mukherjee; Normand Blais; Bernhard J Eigl; Eric Winquist; Naveen S Basappa; Scott A North Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2019-04-26 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: J Lehmann; M Retz; G Steiner; P Albers; E Jaeger; A Knuth; C Lippert; M Koser; K Stockamp; C Otto; H Melchior; C Fassmann; C Potratz; T Loch; H G Derigs; T Becker; T Kälble; H-J Piechota; L Hertle; S Weinknecht; L Weissbach; M Al-Mwalad; A Hamza; H Henss; D Brkovic; S Pomer; J Roloff; P Walz; R Muschter; U Tunn; E Winter; P Bub; U Kaldenbach; S Roth; A Brauers; G Jakse; A E Richter; M Wirth; J Hartlapp; H Van Ahlen; M Stöckle Journal: Urologe A Date: 2003-04-02 Impact factor: 0.639
Authors: Axel Heidenreich; Stefan Wilop; Michael Pinkawa; Daniel Porres; David Pfister Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2012-09-28 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: J Lehmann; H Suttmann; P Albers; B Volkmer; J E Gschwend; G Fechner; M Spahn; A Heidenreich; A Odenthal; C Seif; N Nürnberg; C Wülfing; C Greb; T Kälble; M-O Grimm; C F Fieseler; S Krege; M Retz; H Schulte-Baukloh; M Gerber; M Hack; J Kamradt; M Stöckle Journal: Urologe A Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 0.639
Authors: Wassim Kassouf; Armen Aprikian; Peter Black; Girish Kulkarni; Jonathan Izawa; Libni Eapen; Adrian Fairey; Alan So; Scott North; Ricardo Rendon; Srikala S Sridhar; Tarik Alam; Fadi Brimo; Normand Blais; Chris Booth; Joseph Chin; Peter Chung; Darrel Drachenberg; Yves Fradet; Michael Jewett; Ron Moore; Chris Morash; Bobby Shayegan; Geoffrey Gotto; Neil Fleshner; Fred Saad; D Robert Siemens Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2016-02-08 Impact factor: 1.862