Literature DB >> 11176311

Relationships of cervical, thoracic, and lumbar bone mineral density by quantitative CT.

D Weishaupt1, M E Schweitzer, M N DiCuccio, P E Whitley.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to compare, using quantitative CT (QCT), vertebral bone mineral density (BMD) in the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine in healthy volunteers.
METHOD: QCT of the vertebral bodies of C2, C5, T12, and L4 was performed on 50 healthy volunteers (25 women, 25 men; mean age 31.7 years). Trabecular BMD analysis was performed at each level.
RESULTS: Mean BMDs (mg/cm3 calcium hydroxyapatite) for women and men were highest at C5 (BMD women/men 341.6/300.6 mg/cm3) and C2 (297.2/269.6 mg/cm3) and lowest at T12 (193.1/184.9 mg/cm3) and L4 (186.2/180.1 mg/cm3). The BMD of C2 was statistically significantly different from that of C5, T12, and L4 (p < 0.0001) for both genders. Also, the BMD of C5 differed significantly from that of T12 and L4 (p < 0.0001). The BMD of C5 showed significant gender differences (p = 0.002). Correlation coefficient showed a strong correlation between the BMD of T12 and L4 for both genders (women, r = 0.67; men, r = 0.90).
CONCLUSION: Trabecular BMD of C2 and C5 measured by QCT is significantly higher than trabecular BMD of T12 and L4 in nonosteoporotic volunteers of both genders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11176311     DOI: 10.1097/00004728-200101000-00027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr        ISSN: 0363-8715            Impact factor:   1.826


  14 in total

1.  Morphological and volumetric analysis of the development of atlantoaxial vertical subluxation in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Dokai; Hideki Nagashima; Toru Okano; Yoshiro Nanjo; Yuji Kishimoto; Atsushi Tanida; Suguru Kakite; Hiroshi Hagino
Journal:  Yonago Acta Med       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 1.641

2.  Investigating comparability of quantitative computed tomography with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in assessing bone mineral density of patients with chronic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Hamid Reza Haghighat Khah; Nahid Moradi; Taher Taheri; Morteza Sanei Taheri; Seyed Mansoor Rayegani
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 2.772

3.  Cervical spine bone mineral density as a function of vertebral level and anatomic location.

Authors:  William J Anderst; Eric D Thorhauer; Joon Y Lee; William F Donaldson; James D Kang
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.166

4.  Influence of cervical bone mineral density on cage subsidence in patients following stand-alone anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Christopher Brenke; Martin Dostal; Johann Scharf; Christel Weiß; Kirsten Schmieder; Martin Barth
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Analysis of bone mineral density distribution at trabecular bones in thoracic and lumbar vertebrae using X-ray CT images.

Authors:  Tatsuro Hayashi; Huayue Chen; Kei Miyamoto; Xiangrong Zhou; Takeshi Hara; Ryujiro Yokoyama; Masayuki Kanematsu; Hiroaki Hoshi; Hiroshi Fujita
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Low-dose CT hounsfield units: a reliable methodology for assessing vertebral bone density in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis.

Authors:  Mary Lucy Marques; Nuno Pereira da Silva; Desirée van der Heijde; Monique Reijnierse; Xenofon Baraliakos; Juergen Braun; Floris A van Gaalen; Sofia Ramiro
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2022-06

7.  Rat lumbar vertebrae bone densitometry using multidetector CT.

Authors:  Yi-Xiang J Wang; James F Griffith; Hua Zhou; Kai Chow Choi; Vivian W Y Hung; David K W Yeung; Ling Qin; Anil T Ahuja
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  MR imaging of anterior cruciate ligament tears: is there a gender gap?

Authors:  Laura M Fayad; J Antoni Parellada; Laurence Parker; Mark E Schweitzer
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2003-09-20       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Can abdominal multi-detector CT diagnose spinal osteoporosis?

Authors:  Antonios E Papadakis; Apostolos H Karantanas; Giorgos Papadokostakis; Effie Petinellis; John Damilakis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-07-19       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Bone density and strength from thoracic and lumbar CT scans both predict incident vertebral fractures independently of fracture location.

Authors:  F Johannesdottir; B Allaire; D L Kopperdahl; T M Keaveny; S Sigurdsson; M A Bredella; D E Anderson; E J Samelson; D P Kiel; V G Gudnason; M L Bouxsein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.