OBJECTIVE: To assess the short-term effects of extending inspiratory time by lengthening end-inspiratory pause (EIP) without inducing a clinically significant increase in intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). DESIGN: Controlled, randomized, crossover study. SETTING:Two medical intensive care units of university hospitals. PATIENTS: Sixteen patients with early (< or =48 hrs) ARDS. INTERVENTION: We applied two durations of EIP (0.2 secs and extended) each for 1 hr while keeping all the following ventilatory parameters constant: FIO2, total PEEP (PEEPtot = applied PEEP + PEEPi), tidal volume, inspiratory flow, and respiratory rate. The duration of extended EIP was titrated to avoid an increase of PEEPi of > or =1 cm H2O. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Despite an increase in mean airway pressure (20.6 +/- 2.3 vs. 17.6 +/- 2.1 cm H2O, p < .01), extended EIP did not significantly improve PaO2 (93 +/- 21 vs. 86 +/-16 torr [12.40 +/- 2.80 vs. 11.46 +/- 2.13 kPa] with 0.2 secs EIP, NS). However, although the difference in PaO2 between the two EIP durations was <20 torr (<2.66 kPa) in 14 patients, two patients exhibited a >40 torr (>5.33 kPa) increase in PaO2 with extended EIP. Extended EIP decreased PaCO2 (62 +/- 13 vs. 67 +/- 13 torr [8.26 +/- 1.73 vs. 8.93 +/- 1.73 kPa] with 0.2 secs EIP, p < .01), which resulted in a higher pH (7.22 +/- 0.10 vs. 7.19 +/- 0.09 with 0.2 secs EIP, p < .01) and contributed to a slight increase in arterial hemoglobin saturation (94 +/- 3 vs. 93 +/- 3% with 0.2 EIP, p < .01). No significant difference in hemodynamics was observed. CONCLUSION: In patients with ARDS, extending EIP without inducing a clinically significant increase in PEEPi does not consistently improve arterial oxygenation but enhances CO2 elimination.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To assess the short-term effects of extending inspiratory time by lengthening end-inspiratory pause (EIP) without inducing a clinically significant increase in intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). DESIGN: Controlled, randomized, crossover study. SETTING: Two medical intensive care units of university hospitals. PATIENTS: Sixteen patients with early (< or =48 hrs) ARDS. INTERVENTION: We applied two durations of EIP (0.2 secs and extended) each for 1 hr while keeping all the following ventilatory parameters constant: FIO2, total PEEP (PEEPtot = applied PEEP + PEEPi), tidal volume, inspiratory flow, and respiratory rate. The duration of extended EIP was titrated to avoid an increase of PEEPi of > or =1 cm H2O. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Despite an increase in mean airway pressure (20.6 +/- 2.3 vs. 17.6 +/- 2.1 cm H2O, p < .01), extended EIP did not significantly improve PaO2 (93 +/- 21 vs. 86 +/-16 torr [12.40 +/- 2.80 vs. 11.46 +/- 2.13 kPa] with 0.2 secs EIP, NS). However, although the difference in PaO2 between the two EIP durations was <20 torr (<2.66 kPa) in 14 patients, two patients exhibited a >40 torr (>5.33 kPa) increase in PaO2 with extended EIP. Extended EIP decreased PaCO2 (62 +/- 13 vs. 67 +/- 13 torr [8.26 +/- 1.73 vs. 8.93 +/- 1.73 kPa] with 0.2 secs EIP, p < .01), which resulted in a higher pH (7.22 +/- 0.10 vs. 7.19 +/- 0.09 with 0.2 secs EIP, p < .01) and contributed to a slight increase in arterial hemoglobin saturation (94 +/- 3 vs. 93 +/- 3% with 0.2 EIP, p < .01). No significant difference in hemodynamics was observed. CONCLUSION: In patients with ARDS, extending EIP without inducing a clinically significant increase in PEEPi does not consistently improve arterial oxygenation but enhances CO2 elimination.
Authors: Francesca Campoccia Jalde; Abdul Raoof Almadhoob; Jennifer Beck; Arthur S Slutsky; Michael S Dunn; Christer Sinderby Journal: Neonatology Date: 2009-11-04 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Carlos Ferrando; Marisa García; Andrea Gutierrez; Jose A Carbonell; Gerardo Aguilar; Marina Soro; Francisco J Belda Journal: BMC Anesthesiol Date: 2014-10-22 Impact factor: 2.217
Authors: Jonne Doorduin; Joeke L Nollet; Manon P A J Vugts; Lisanne H Roesthuis; Ferdi Akankan; Johannes G van der Hoeven; Hieronymus W H van Hees; Leo M A Heunks Journal: Crit Care Date: 2016-05-05 Impact factor: 9.097