OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal site and frequency for vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) surveillance to minimize the number of days of VRE colonization before identification and subsequent isolation. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The increasing prevalence of VRE and the limited therapeutic options for its treatment demand early identification of colonization to prevent transmission. METHODS: The authors conducted a 3-month prospective observational study in medical and surgical intensive care unit (ICU) patients with a stay of 3 days or more. Oropharyngeal and rectal swabs, tracheal and gastric aspirates, and urine specimens were cultured for VRE on admission to the ICU and twice weekly until discharge. RESULTS: Of 117 evaluable patients, 23 (20%) were colonized by VRE. Twelve patients (10%) had VRE infection. Of nine patients who developed infections after ICU admission, eight were colonized before infection. The rectum was the first site of colonization in 92% of patients, and positive rectal cultures preceded 89% of infections acquired in the ICU. This was supported by strain delineations using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Twice-weekly rectal surveillance alone identified 93% of the maximal estimated VRE-related patient-days; weekly or admission-only surveillance was less effective. As a test for future VRE infection, rectal surveillance culture twice weekly had a negative predictive value of 99%, a positive predictive value of 44%, and a relative risk for infection of 34. CONCLUSIONS: Twice-weekly rectal VRE surveillance of critically ill patients is an effective strategy for early identification of colonized patients at increased risk for VRE transmission, infection, and death.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal site and frequency for vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) surveillance to minimize the number of days of VRE colonization before identification and subsequent isolation. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The increasing prevalence of VRE and the limited therapeutic options for its treatment demand early identification of colonization to prevent transmission. METHODS: The authors conducted a 3-month prospective observational study in medical and surgical intensive care unit (ICU) patients with a stay of 3 days or more. Oropharyngeal and rectal swabs, tracheal and gastric aspirates, and urine specimens were cultured for VRE on admission to the ICU and twice weekly until discharge. RESULTS: Of 117 evaluable patients, 23 (20%) were colonized by VRE. Twelve patients (10%) had VRE infection. Of nine patients who developed infections after ICU admission, eight were colonized before infection. The rectum was the first site of colonization in 92% of patients, and positive rectal cultures preceded 89% of infections acquired in the ICU. This was supported by strain delineations using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Twice-weekly rectal surveillance alone identified 93% of the maximal estimated VRE-related patient-days; weekly or admission-only surveillance was less effective. As a test for future VRE infection, rectal surveillance culture twice weekly had a negative predictive value of 99%, a positive predictive value of 44%, and a relative risk for infection of 34. CONCLUSIONS: Twice-weekly rectal VRE surveillance of critically illpatients is an effective strategy for early identification of colonized patients at increased risk for VRE transmission, infection, and death.
Authors: J Quale; D Landman; E Atwood; B Kreiswirth; B M Willey; V Ditore; M Zaman; K Patel; G Saurina; W Huang; E Oydna; S Burney Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 1996-10 Impact factor: 2.918
Authors: M A Montecalvo; D K Shay; C Gedris; C Petrullo; J Uman; K Rodney; W R Jarvis; G P Wormser Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 1997-10 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: D W Beezhold; S Slaughter; M K Hayden; M Matushek; C Nathan; G M Trenholme; R A Weinstein Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 1997-04 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: F C Tenover; R D Arbeit; R V Goering; P A Mickelsen; B E Murray; D H Persing; B Swaminathan Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 1995-09 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: J W Weinstein; M Roe; M Towns; L Sanders; J J Thorpe; G R Corey; D J Sexton Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 1996-01 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: E M Jochimsen; L Fish; K Manning; S Young; D A Singer; R Baker; W R Jarvis Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 1999-02 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: R N Jones; S A Marshall; M A Pfaller; W W Wilke; R J Hollis; M E Erwin; M B Edmond; R P Wenzel Journal: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 1997-10 Impact factor: 2.803
Authors: Enrique Cerdá; Ana Abella; Miguel A de la Cal; José A Lorente; Paloma García-Hierro; Hendrick K F van Saene; Inmaculada Alía; Ainhoa Aranguren Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: S Simjee; D G White; P F McDermott; D D Wagner; M J Zervos; S M Donabedian; L L English; J R Hayes; R D Walker Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Young Kyung Yoon; Hee Sun Sim; Jeong Yeon Kim; Dae Won Park; Jang Wook Sohn; Kyung Ho Roh; Seung Eun Lee; Min Ja Kim Journal: Yonsei Med J Date: 2009-10-21 Impact factor: 2.759
Authors: Rachel E Rosenberg Goldstein; Shirley A Micallef; Shawn G Gibbs; Xin He; Ashish George; Amir Sapkota; Sam W Joseph; Amy R Sapkota Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2014-04-17 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Abigail Collingwood; Freida Blostein; Anna M Seekatz; Christiane E Wobus; Robert J Woods; Betsy Foxman; Michael A Bachman Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2020-01-12 Impact factor: 3.835