Literature DB >> 11174860

Efficiency and cost saving of 7 day per week exercise testing utilizing all electrocardiography technologists.

G Smith1, D Mooney, L Davey, L Nebo, M E Irwin, M P Senaratne.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In most centers, exercise testing (ET) is performed by one or two trained technologists during the weekdays (0800 hours-1600 hours), leaving a void during evenings and weekends. This leads to unnecessary increased costs due to delays in management of patients. Electrocardiography technologists (ECGT) are often available for extended hours. This project was undertaken to improve the efficiency of the ET laboratory by using ECGT to perform ET during these extended hours.
METHODS: Clinical utility and cost saving of a 7 day per week ET for management of patients with suspected and/or known coronary artery disease utilizing ECGT was assessed after adequate training. Of 4099 patients undergoing ET between January 1995 and December 1997, 810 tests performed by ECGT were reviewed retrospectively.
RESULTS: Of the 810 patients (age mean 58.4 +/- 0.44 yrs; range 16-88; males: 508, females: 302), 806 (99.5%) underwent the Bruce protocol. The indications were: diagnostic, 61.3%, predischarge acute myocardial infarction (AMI), 17.7%, evaluation of angina, 19.6%, other, 1.4%. Only 8 (0.1%) patients had complications (prolonged chest pain, 6; nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, 2) with no AMIs or deaths. This strategy resulted in a savings of 158 bed days (Can189,600 dollars) on inpatients and 15 bed days (Can18,000 dollars) on those presenting to the emergency department.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of utilizing ECGT for ET thus extending the hours of service. This resulted in efficient patient management, with a considerable cost-saving to the hospital.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11174860      PMCID: PMC7027605          DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-474x.2001.tb00083.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol        ISSN: 1082-720X            Impact factor:   1.468


  5 in total

Review 1.  ACC/AHA Guidelines for Exercise Testing. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Exercise Testing).

Authors:  R J Gibbons; G J Balady; J W Beasley; J T Bricker; W F Duvernoy; V F Froelicher; D B Mark; T H Marwick; B D McCallister; P D Thompson; W L Winters; F G Yanowitz; J L Ritchie; R J Gibbons; M D Cheitlin; K A Eagle; T J Gardner; A Garson; R P Lewis; R A O'Rourke; T J Ryan
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 2.  Evaluation of chest pain in the emergency department.

Authors:  R L Jesse; M C Kontos
Journal:  Curr Probl Cardiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.200

3.  Exercise testing after myocardial infarction: relative values of the low level predischarge and the postdischarge exercise test.

Authors:  M P Senaratne; L A Hsu; R E Rossall; C T Kappagoda
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Feasibility of direct discharge from the coronary/intermediate care unit after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  M P Senaratne; M E Irwin; S Shaben; J Griffiths; J Nagendran; L Kasza; S Gulamhusein; M Haughian
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1999-03-15       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  A new system of multiple-lead exercise electrocardiography.

Authors:  R E Mason; I Likar
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1966-02       Impact factor: 4.749

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.