Literature DB >> 11174782

Experience in the United States with intact abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

T S Huber1, J G Wang, A E Derrow, D A Dame, C K Ozaki, G B Zelenock, T C Flynn, J M Seeger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the current outcome in the United States and to identify predictors of mortality and "bad outcome" after open, intact abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair.
METHODS: In a retrospective analysis, data were obtained from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample during 1994-1996. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample is a 20% all-payer stratified sample of nonfederal United States hospitals. Patients older than 49 years were identified by the presence of primary diagnostic (441.4-intact AAA) and procedure (38.44-resection of abdominal aorta with replacement) codes of the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9 ). In-hospital mortality rate, discharge disposition, bad outcome (death or discharge to an institution), complications (ICD-9 postoperative codes), length of stay, and charges were determined. The mortality rate and bad outcome were analyzed by the use of patient demographics (age, sex, race), patient comorbidities (ICD-9 diagnostic codes), calendar year, and hospital characteristics (size, location, teaching status) with univariate and multivariate analyses.
RESULTS: We identified 16,450 intact AAAs repairs during the study years. The mean patient age was 72 +/- 7 (+/- SD) years, and most patients were male (79.7%) and white (94.6%). Most repairs were performed at large (67.3%), urban (92.5%), and nonteaching (66.7%) institutions. The in-hospital mortality rate was 4.2%, the overall complication rate was 32.4%, and 91.2% of patients were discharged home, whereas the bad outcome rate was 12.6%. The median length of stay was 8 days (mean, 10.0 +/- 8.1), and median hospital charges were $28,052 (mean, $35,681 +/- $33,006) in 1996 dollars. Multivariate analysis showed that the mortality rate (P <.05) increased with age (70-79 years, 1.8 odds ratio [OR] [95% CI, 1.4-2.3], > 79 years, 3.8 OR [95% CI, 2.9-4.9]), sex (female, 1.6 OR [95% CI, 1.3-1.9]), cerebral vascular occlusive disease (1.8 OR [95% CI, 1.3-2.5]), preoperative renal insufficiency (9.5 OR [95% CI, 7.7-11.7]), and more than three comorbidities (11.2 OR [95% CI, 3.6-35.4]). Multivariate analysis also showed that bad outcome was associated with the same variables in addition to hospital size (small/medium), year of procedure (1996), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and two to three comorbidities.
CONCLUSIONS: Outcome after open repair of intact AAA across the United States is quite good. Older, sicker patients may benefit from nonoperative treatment or the potentially lower risk endovascular approaches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11174782     DOI: 10.1067/mva.2001.112703

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  13 in total

1.  Disparities in the treatment and outcomes of vascular disease in Hispanic patients.

Authors:  Nicholas J Morrissey; Jeannine Giacovelli; Natalia Egorova; Annetine Gelijns; Alan Moskowitz; James McKinsey; Kenneth Craig Kent; Giampaolo Greco
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.268

2.  Open versus endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a survey of Canadian vascular surgeons.

Authors:  Tara M Mastracci; Catherine M Clase; Philip J Devereaux; Claudio S Cinà
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Comparison of risk-scoring systems in predicting hospital mortality after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Chaiyarat Supsamutchai; Chumpon Wilasrusmee; Panuwat Lertsithichai; Napaphat Proprom; Dilip S Kittur
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2008

4.  Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA): cost-effectiveness of screening, surveillance of intermediate-sized AAA, and management of symptomatic AAA.

Authors:  Marc D Silverstein; Stephen R Pitts; Elliot L Chaikof; David J Ballard
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2005-10

5.  Complications after open surgery for the abdominal aorta and its branches depending on patients' age: PS102.

Authors:  Kaszuba Aleksandra; Gajdosz Anna; Iwańska Anna; Kacorzyk Radosław
Journal:  Porto Biomed J       Date:  2017-09-01

6.  Variation in death rate after abdominal aortic aneurysmectomy in the United States: impact of hospital volume, gender, and age.

Authors:  Justin B Dimick; James C Stanley; David A Axelrod; Andris Kazmers; Peter K Henke; Lloyd A Jacobs; Thomas W Wakefield; Lazar J Greenfield; Gilbert R Upchurch
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Defining high-risk patients for endovascular aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Natalia Egorova; Jeannine K Giacovelli; Annetine Gelijns; Giampaolo Greco; Alan Moskowitz; James McKinsey; K Craig Kent
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 4.268

8.  Abdominal aortic aneurysms in "high-risk" surgical patients: comparison of open and endovascular repair.

Authors:  William D Jordan; Francisco Alcocer; Douglas J Wirthlin; Andrew O Westfall; David Whitley
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Transradial approach for the endovascular treatment of type I endoleak after aortic aneurysm repair: a case report.

Authors:  Gabriele Giacomo Schiattarella; Fabio Magliulo; Flora Ilaria Laurino; Roberta Bottino; Antonio Giulio Bruno; Michele De Paulis; Antonio Sorropago; Cinzia Perrino; Bruno Amato; Dario Leosco; Bruno Trimarco; Giovanni Esposito
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Lifeline registry of endovascular aneurysm repair: open repair surgical controls in clinical trials.

Authors:  Robert M Zwolak; Anton N Sidawy; Roy K Greenberg; Marc L Schermerhorn; Rebecca J Shackelton; Flora S Siami
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 4.268

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.