Literature DB >> 11174772

Multistate utilization, processes, and outcomes of carotid endarterectomy.

T F Kresowik1, D Bratzler, H R Karp, R A Hemann, M E Hendel, S L Grund, M Brenton, E F Ellerbeck, D S Nilasena.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to describe variation in utilization, care processes, and outcomes for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) procedures in 10 states.
METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of Medicare patients who underwent 10,561 CEA procedures between June 1, 1995, and May 31, 1996, in 10 different states to determine indications, care processes, and outcomes. This study also included medical record review of hospital readmissions within 30 days of the procedure and identification of out-of-hospital deaths from the Medicare beneficiary files.
RESULTS: Utilization rates of CEA varied from 25.7 to 38.4 procedures per 10,000 Medicare beneficiaries among states. The overall combined event rate (30-day stroke or mortality) was 5.2% for primary CEA alone (n = 9945). The mortality rate was 1.5%, and the nonfatal stroke rate was 3.7%. Combined event rates (CEA alone) by surgical indication were 7.7% for stroke (n = 1037), 7.4% for transient ischemic attack (n = 1304), 5.3% for nonspecific symptoms (n = 3713), and 3.7% for asymptomatic patients (n = 3891). The combined event rates (CEA alone) among states ranged from 4.1% to 7.7% with the event rates in asymptomatic patients ranging from 2.3% to 6.7%. In a multivariate analysis (correcting for indication), the use of preoperative antiplatelet agents (odds ratio [OR], 0.70), intraoperative heparin (OR, 0.49), and patch angioplasty (OR, 0.73) was significantly associated with lower combined event rates. There were significant differences among states in the use of preoperative antiplatelet therapy (range, 56%-70%) and patch angioplasty (range, 11%-49%). Combined event rates for repeat procedures (n = 380) and CEA combined with coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 236) were 6.3% and 17.4%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The striking variation among states suggests that there is room for improvement in the utilization, care processes, and outcomes of CEA. All surgeons performing CEA should participate in outcome assessment and adopt protocols that include the routine administration of antiplatelet agents preoperatively, the use of heparin intraoperatively, and patch angioplasty of the endarterectomy site.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11174772     DOI: 10.1067/mva.2001.111881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  15 in total

1.  The inappropriate use of carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Henry J M Barnett
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-08-31       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Patches for carotid artery endarterectomy: current materials and prospects.

Authors:  Akihito Muto; Toshiya Nishibe; Herbert Dardik; Alan Dardik
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 3.  Time to rethink management strategies in asymptomatic carotid artery disease.

Authors:  A Ross Naylor
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 32.419

4.  Physician specialty and variation in carotid revascularization technique selected for Medicare patients.

Authors:  Jessica B Wallaert; Brian W Nolan; David H Stone; Richard J Powell; Jeremiah R Brown; Jack L Cronenwett; Philip P Goodney
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 5.  The appropriate use of carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Henry J M Barnett; Heather E Meldrum; Michael Eliasziw
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-04-30       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  A risk factor-based predictive model of outcomes in carotid endarterectomy: the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2005-2010.

Authors:  Kimon Bekelis; Samuel F Bakhoum; Atman Desai; Todd A Mackenzie; Philip Goodney; Nicos Labropoulos
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 7.  Temporal trends in safety of carotid endarterectomy in asymptomatic patients: systematic review.

Authors:  Alex B Munster; Angelo J Franchini; Mahim I Qureshi; Ankur Thapar; Alun H Davies
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Carotid stenosis: endarterectomy or angioplasty and stenting?

Authors:  Jeffrey A Switzer; David C Hess
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.598

9.  Risk factors for perioperative death and stroke after carotid endarterectomy: results of the new york carotid artery surgery study.

Authors:  Ethan A Halm; Stanley Tuhrim; Jason J Wang; Caron Rockman; Thomas S Riles; Mark R Chassin
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Elective and isolated carotid endarterectomy: health disparities in utilization and outcomes, but not readmission.

Authors:  Byron S Kennedy; Stephen P Fortmann; Randall S Stafford
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.798

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.