M A Priestley1, J A Golden, I B O'Hara, J McCann, C D Kurth. 1. Brain Research Laboratory, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 34th St. and Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Priestley@email.chop.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest for neonatal heart surgery poses the risk of brain damage. Several studies suggest that pH-stat management during cardiopulmonary bypass improves neurologic outcome compared with alpha-stat management. This study compared neurologic outcome in a survival piglet model of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest between alpha-stat and pH-stat cardiopulmonary bypass. METHODS: Piglets were randomly assigned to alpha-stat (n = 7) or pH-stat (n = 7) cardiopulmonary bypass, cooled to 19 degrees C brain temperature, and subjected to 90 minutes of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. After bypass rewarming/reperfusion, they survived 2 days. Neurologic outcome was assessed by neurologic performance (0-95, 0 = no deficit and 95 = brain death) and functional disability scores, as well as histopathology. Arterial pressure, blood gas, glucose, and brain temperature were recorded before, during, and after bypass. RESULTS: All physiologic data during cardiopulmonary bypass were similar between groups (pH-stat vs alpha-stat) except arterial pH (7.06 +/- 0.03 vs 7.43 +/- 0.09, P <.001) and arterial PCO (2) (98 +/- 8 vs 36 +/- 8 mm Hg, P <.001). No differences existed in duration of cardiopulmonary bypass or time to extubation. Performance was better in pH-stat versus alpha-stat management at 24 hours (2 +/- 3 vs 29 +/- 17, P = 0.004) and 48 hours (1 +/- 2 vs 8 +/- 9, P =.1). Also, functional disability was less severe with pH-stat management at 24 hours (P =.002) and 48 hours (P =.053). Neuronal cell damage was less severe with pH-stat versus alpha-stat in the neocortex (4% +/- 2% vs 15% +/- 7%, P <.001) and hippocampal CA1 region (11% +/- 5% vs 33% +/- 25%, P =.04), but not in the hippocampal CA3 region (3% +/- 5% vs 16% +/- 23%, P =.18) or dentate gyrus (1% +/- 1% vs 3% +/- 6%, P =.63). CONCLUSIONS: pH-stat cardiopulmonary bypass management improves neurologic outcome with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest compared with alpha-stat bypass. The mechanism of protection is not related to hemodynamics, hematocrit, glucose, or brain temperature.
OBJECTIVE:Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest for neonatal heart surgery poses the risk of brain damage. Several studies suggest that pH-stat management during cardiopulmonary bypass improves neurologic outcome compared with alpha-stat management. This study compared neurologic outcome in a survival piglet model of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest between alpha-stat and pH-stat cardiopulmonary bypass. METHODS: Piglets were randomly assigned to alpha-stat (n = 7) or pH-stat (n = 7) cardiopulmonary bypass, cooled to 19 degrees C brain temperature, and subjected to 90 minutes of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. After bypass rewarming/reperfusion, they survived 2 days. Neurologic outcome was assessed by neurologic performance (0-95, 0 = no deficit and 95 = brain death) and functional disability scores, as well as histopathology. Arterial pressure, blood gas, glucose, and brain temperature were recorded before, during, and after bypass. RESULTS: All physiologic data during cardiopulmonary bypass were similar between groups (pH-stat vs alpha-stat) except arterial pH (7.06 +/- 0.03 vs 7.43 +/- 0.09, P <.001) and arterial PCO (2) (98 +/- 8 vs 36 +/- 8 mm Hg, P <.001). No differences existed in duration of cardiopulmonary bypass or time to extubation. Performance was better in pH-stat versus alpha-stat management at 24 hours (2 +/- 3 vs 29 +/- 17, P = 0.004) and 48 hours (1 +/- 2 vs 8 +/- 9, P =.1). Also, functional disability was less severe with pH-stat management at 24 hours (P =.002) and 48 hours (P =.053). Neuronal cell damage was less severe with pH-stat versus alpha-stat in the neocortex (4% +/- 2% vs 15% +/- 7%, P <.001) and hippocampal CA1 region (11% +/- 5% vs 33% +/- 25%, P =.04), but not in the hippocampal CA3 region (3% +/- 5% vs 16% +/- 23%, P =.18) or dentate gyrus (1% +/- 1% vs 3% +/- 6%, P =.63). CONCLUSIONS: pH-stat cardiopulmonary bypass management improves neurologic outcome with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest compared with alpha-stat bypass. The mechanism of protection is not related to hemodynamics, hematocrit, glucose, or brain temperature.
Authors: Stuart H Friess; Rebecca N Ichord; Kristin Owens; Jill Ralston; Rebecca Rizol; Karen L Overall; Colin Smith; Mark A Helfaer; Susan S Margulies Journal: Exp Neurol Date: 2006-12-15 Impact factor: 5.330
Authors: Afsaneh Pirzadeh; Gregory Schears; Peter Pastuszko; Huiping Liu; Joanna Kubin; Erin Reade; Alberto Mendoza-Paredes; William Greeley; Vinay Nadkarni; David F Wilson; Anna Pastuszko Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Scott D Markowitz; Alberto Mendoza-Paredes; Huiping Liu; Peter Pastuszko; Steven P Schultz; Gregory J Schears; William J Greeley; David F Wilson; Anna Pastuszko Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Lars J Bjertnæs; Torvind O Næsheim; Eirik Reierth; Evgeny V Suborov; Mikhail Y Kirov; Konstantin M Lebedinskii; Torkjel Tveita Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2022-02-23
Authors: Sherreen G Batts; Thornton S Mu; Jane H Uyehara-Lock; Lee-Ann Murata; Catherine F T Uyehara Journal: ASAIO J Date: 2016 Nov/Dec Impact factor: 2.872