A Abron1, M Hopfensperger, J Thompson, L F Cooper. 1. The Dental Research Center and School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Abstract
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Alterations in commercially pure titanium (cp Ti) implant surface topography can be made to increase bone formation or the interfacial shear strength of bone at the functioning implant. It is not known whether these 2 goals are congruent or mutually exclusive. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of implant surface topography parameters of calculated biomechanical significance on the process of bone formation in a rat tibia model of osseointegration. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Implants (cp Ti grade IV) were machined and subsequently treated by grit blasting or grit blasting and 6.4 mol/L HCl. Measurements of surface roughness were made by atomic force microscopic analysis of similarly treated titanium disks. Cleaned and sterilized implants (12 machined, 12 with nonideal pit morphology, 12 with ideal pit morphology) were placed into the tibiae of 400-g male Wistar rats by using a series of drills, irrigation, and a self-tapping procedure. After 3 weeks, tibiae were harvested and processed and embedded in methyl methacrylate resin. Polished sections were examined by backscatter electron microscopy, and the percentage implant surface contacting bone was measured with the Scionics PC image analysis program. RESULTS. The implants possessing a proposed ideal pit morphology supported significantly greater bone formation at the implant surface (54% +/- 7% bone-to-implant contact [P<.003]) than the nonideal pit morphology (40% +/- 15%) or machined surfaces (34% +/- 6%). CONCLUSION: Implant surfaces with a proposed ideal pit morphology (which possess a calculated biomechanical significance) enhanced bone formation at early periods after placement in the rat tibia model.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Alterations in commercially pure titanium (cp Ti) implant surface topography can be made to increase bone formation or the interfacial shear strength of bone at the functioning implant. It is not known whether these 2 goals are congruent or mutually exclusive. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of implant surface topography parameters of calculated biomechanical significance on the process of bone formation in a rat tibia model of osseointegration. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Implants (cp Ti grade IV) were machined and subsequently treated by grit blasting or grit blasting and 6.4 mol/L HCl. Measurements of surface roughness were made by atomic force microscopic analysis of similarly treated titanium disks. Cleaned and sterilized implants (12 machined, 12 with nonideal pit morphology, 12 with ideal pit morphology) were placed into the tibiae of 400-g male Wistar rats by using a series of drills, irrigation, and a self-tapping procedure. After 3 weeks, tibiae were harvested and processed and embedded in methyl methacrylate resin. Polished sections were examined by backscatter electron microscopy, and the percentage implant surface contacting bone was measured with the Scionics PC image analysis program. RESULTS. The implants possessing a proposed ideal pit morphology supported significantly greater bone formation at the implant surface (54% +/- 7% bone-to-implant contact [P<.003]) than the nonideal pit morphology (40% +/- 15%) or machined surfaces (34% +/- 6%). CONCLUSION: Implant surfaces with a proposed ideal pit morphology (which possess a calculated biomechanical significance) enhanced bone formation at early periods after placement in the rat tibia model.
Authors: Wang Shizhen; Meng Wei-Yan; Jiao Guotian; Zhang Bin; Li Baosheng; Dou Linbo; Niu Jincheng; Cai Qing Journal: Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi Date: 2014-12
Authors: Omar Omar; Maria Lennerås; Sara Svensson; Felicia Suska; Lena Emanuelsson; Jan Hall; Ulf Nannmark; Peter Thomsen Journal: J Mater Sci Mater Med Date: 2009-10-25 Impact factor: 3.896