Literature DB >> 11174531

Periodontal status of mandibular incisors after pronounced orthodontic advancement during adolescence: a follow-up evaluation.

J Artun1, D Grobéty.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze whether pronounced orthodontic advancement of the mandibular incisors during Class II correction in the mixed dentition results in gingival recession. Through mandibular superimposition of the pretreatment and posttreatment cephalograms of 67 Class II patients who were treated with reverse headgear to the mandibular dentition, 45 patients with a minimum of a 1-mm advancement of the cementoenamel junction (CEJ; mean, 2.18 +/- 0.87) and a minimum of a 2-mm advancement of the incisal edge (mean, 3.87 +/- 1.34) were identified. Using the same protocol in Class II patients, 30 individuals who finished treatment at a similar time and age, but without reverse headgear and with no advancement of the CEJ (mean -0.43, SD 0.53) and a maximum of 1-mm advancement of the incisal edge (mean -0.26, SD 1.15) were identified. Before treatment, the mandibular incisors were more retruded, relative to the line from point A to pogonion and relative to the mandibular plane in the patients with pronounced advancement than in those with no advancement of the mandibular incisors; no differences were found at the time of appliance removal. A total of 30 patients with pronounced advancement and 21 patients with no advancement could meet for a follow-up examination a mean period of 7.83 years (SD, 4.44) and 9.38 years (SD, 4.39) after treatment, respectively. Clinical examinations at the time of follow-up revealed no differences in the amount of recession, the width of attached gingiva, the length of supracrestal connective tissue attachment, the probing pocket depth, and gingival bleeding index or visible plaque index of the mandibular incisors between the patients in the 2 groups. An examination of color slides demonstrated no differences in the number of mandibular incisors that developed recession from before treatment to after treatment and from after treatment to follow-up. Measurement of mandibular incisor crown height on the study models demonstrated no difference in the increase in clinical crown height from after treatment to follow-up between the patients in the 2 groups. It was concluded that pronounced advancement of the mandibular incisors may be performed in adolescent patients with dentoalveolar retrusion without increasing the risk of recession.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11174531     DOI: 10.1067/mod.2001.111403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  16 in total

1.  Control of lower incisor inclination with a completely customized lingual appliance for dentoalveolar compensation of class III malocclusion.

Authors:  Stefan Lossdörfer; Rainer Schwestka-Polly; Dirk Wiechmann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 1.938

Review 2.  CBCT in orthodontics: assessment of treatment outcomes and indications for its use.

Authors:  S D Kapila; J M Nervina
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Prevalence, magnitude, and incidence of labial gingival recession with Herbst-multibracket appliance treatment: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Niko C Bock; Julia Ruehl; Sabine Ruf
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Gingival recessions of lower incisors after proclination by orthodontics alone or in combination with anterior mandibular alveolar process distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Gregory S Antonarakis; Christof Urs Joss; Albino Triaca; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman; Stavros Kiliaridis
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Immediate periodontal bone plate changes induced by rapid maxillary expansion in the early mixed dentition: CT findings.

Authors:  Daniela Gamba Garib; Maria Helena Ocké Menezes; Omar Gabriel Silva Filho; Patricia Bittencourt Dutra Santos
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2014 May-Jun

6.  Does the decision to extract influence the development of gingival recessions? A retrospective long-term evaluation.

Authors:  Nicolas M Villard; Raphael Patcas
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.938

7.  Gingival biotype in relation to incisors' inclination and position.

Authors:  Khalid H Zawawi; Mohammad S Al-Zahrani
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.484

8.  The effect of changes in lower incisor inclination on gingival recession.

Authors:  Gulen Kamak; Hasan Kamak; Hakan Keklik; Hakan Gurcan Gurel
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2015-04-16

9.  Correlation analysis of gingival recession after orthodontic treatment in the anterior region: an evaluation of soft and hard tissues.

Authors:  Jong-Bin Lee; Soo-Jin Baek; Minji Kim; Eun-Kyoung Pang
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 2.614

10.  CBCT assessment of alveolar buccal bone level after RME.

Authors:  Valmy Pangrazio-Kulbersh; Brynn Jezdimir; Mariana de Deus Haughey; Richard Kulbersh; Paul Wine; Richard Kaczynski
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.