Literature DB >> 11173947

Long-term effectiveness of sacral nerve stimulation for refractory urge incontinence.

R A Janknegt1, M M Hassouna, S W Siegel, R A Schmidt, J B Gajewski, D A Rivas, M M Elhilali, D C Milam, P E van Kerrebroeck, H E Dijkema, A A Lycklama à Nÿeholt, M Fall, U Jonas, F Catanzaro, C J Fowler, K A Oleson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for refractory urinary urge incontinence. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Urge incontinent patients qualified for surgical implantation of a neurostimulator system after trial screening with percutaneous test stimulation. Surgical implantation of the InterStim System (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, Minn., USA) was performed in cases where a >50% reduction in incontinence symptoms was documented during the 3- to 7-day test stimulation period. The InterStim System consists of an implantable pulse generator, a transforamenally placed quadripolar lead, and an extension that connects these two devices for unilateral stimulation of the S3 or S4 sacral nerve. Efficacy for 96 implanted patients was based on urinary symptom changes as quantified in voiding diaries collected at baseline and annually after surgical implantation.
RESULTS: As compared to baseline, the group of 96 implanted patients demonstrated significant reductions in urge incontinent symptoms at an average of 30.8+/-14.8 (range 12-60) months with respect to the number of urge incontinent episodes per day, severity of leaking, and the number of absorbent pads/diapers replaced per day due to incontinence (all p<0.0001, respectively). Gender, pretreatment variables, and age were not found to be relevant factors that affected these results. 11 of the 96 patients underwent device explant due to lack of efficacy, pain or bowel dysfunction. These data were conservatively included in the efficacy results. No permanent injuries associated with the devices or therapy were reported.
CONCLUSION: Sacral nerve stimulation is an effective treatment for refractory urge incontinence with sustained long-term benefit through an average of 30.8 months.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11173947     DOI: 10.1159/000052420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  24 in total

1.  Lead migration after sacral neuromodulation: surgical revision in fascial versus tined anchoring systems.

Authors:  Nazema Y Siddiqui; Cindy L Amundsen; Elizabeth G Corey; Jennifer M Wu
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  [Sacral neuromodulation in treatment of functional disorders of the lower urinary tract. An overview of basic principles, indications, outcomes].

Authors:  A Bannowsky; C Seif; S Sugimoto; G Böhler; C van der Horst; S Bross; P Alken; K-P Jünemann; P M Braun
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-04-04       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  A systematic review of clinical studies of electrical stimulation for treatment of lower urinary tract dysfunction.

Authors:  Ash K Monga; Michael R Tracey; Jeyakumar Subbaroyan
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 4.  Sacral nerve modulation in overactive bladder.

Authors:  John A Occhino; Steven W Siegel
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  CUA guideline on adult overactive bladder.

Authors:  Jacques Corcos; Mikolaj Przydacz; Lysanne Campeau; Gary Gray; Duane Hickling; Christiane Honeine; Sidney B Radomski; Lynn Stothers; Adrian Wagg; Frcp Lond
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  The Impact of Duration of Complaints on Successful Outcome of Sacral Neuromodulation.

Authors:  Ranjana Jairam; Jamie Drossaerts; Gommert van Koeveringe; Philip van Kerrebroeck
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2017-05-06       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Battery explantation after sacral neuromodulation in the Medicare population.

Authors:  Anne P Cameron; Jennifer T Anger; Rodger Madison; Christopher S Saigal; J Quentin Clemens
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 2.696

8.  Sacral nerve stimulation for urinary urge incontinence, urgency-frequency, urinary retention, and fecal incontinence: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2005-03-01

9.  Prospective tests on biological models of acupuncture.

Authors:  Charles Shang
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 2.629

10.  Refractory overactive bladder: Beyond oral anticholinergic therapy.

Authors:  Ronald W Glinski; Steven Siegel
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2007-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.