Literature DB >> 11173851

Prenatal molecular cytogenetic diagnosis of partial tetrasomy 10p due to neocentromere formation in an inversion duplication analphoid marker chromosome.

B Levy1, P Papenhausen, J Tepperberg, T Dunn, S Fallet, M Magid, N Kardon, K Hirschhorn, P Warburton.   

Abstract

Neocentromeres are fully functional centromeres found on rearranged or marker chromosomes that have separated from endogenous centromeres. Neocentromeres often result in partial tri- or tetrasomy because their formation confers mitotic stability to acentric chromosome fragments that would normally be lost. We describe the prenatal identification and characterization of a de novo supernumerary marker chromosome (SMC) containing a neocentromere in a 20-wk fetus by the combined use of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). GTG-banding of fetal metaphases revealed a 47,XY,+mar karyotype in 100% of cultured amniocytes; parental karyotypes were both normal. Although sequential tricolor FISH using chromosome-specific painting probes identified a chromosome 10 origin of the marker, a complete panel of chromosome-specific centromeric satellite DNA probes failed to hybridize to any portion of the marker. The presence of a neocentromere on the marker chromosome was confirmed by the absence of hybridization of an all-human-centromere alpha-satellite DNA probe, which hybridizes to all normal centromeres, and the presence of centromere protein (CENP)-C, which is associated specifically with active kinetochores. Based on CGH analysis and FISH with a chromosome 10p subtelomeric probe, the marker was found to be an inversion duplication of the distal portion of chromosome 10p. Thus, the proband's karyotype was 47,XY,+inv dup(10)(pter-->p14 approximately 15::p14 approximately 15-->neo-->pter), which is the first report of partial tetrasomy 10p resulting from an analphoid marker chromosome with a neocentromere. This study illustrates the use of several molecular strategies in distinguishing centric alphoid markers from neocentric analphoid markers. Copyright 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11173851     DOI: 10.1159/000056839

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet        ISSN: 0301-0171


  6 in total

Review 1.  Chromosomal dynamics of human neocentromere formation.

Authors:  Peter E Warburton
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Redefining the risks of prenatally ascertained supernumerary marker chromosomes: a collaborative study.

Authors:  M D Graf; L Christ; J T Mascarello; P Mowrey; M Pettenati; G Stetten; P Storto; U Surti; D L Van Dyke; G H Vance; D Wolff; S Schwartz
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 3.  Neocentromeres: new insights into centromere structure, disease development, and karyotype evolution.

Authors:  Owen J Marshall; Anderly C Chueh; Lee H Wong; K H Andy Choo
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 4.  Neocentromeres: role in human disease, evolution, and centromere study.

Authors:  David J Amor; K H Andy Choo
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-08-26       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Partial trisomy 2q33.3-q37.3 in a patient with an inverted duplicated neocentric marker chromosome.

Authors:  Ruiyu Ma; Ying Peng; Yanghui Zhang; Yan Xia; Guizhi Tang; Jiazhen Chang; Ruolan Guo; Baoheng Gui; Yanru Huang; Chen Chen; Desheng Liang; Lingqian Wu
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 2.009

6.  Case Report: Prenatal Identification of a De Novo Mosaic Neocentric Marker Resulting in 13q31.1→qter Tetrasomy in a Mildly Affected Girl.

Authors:  Avinash V Dharmadhikari; Elaine M Pereira; Carli C Andrews; Michael Macera; Nina Harkavy; Ronald Wapner; Vaidehi Jobanputra; Brynn Levy; Mythily Ganapathi; Jun Liao
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 4.772

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.