Literature DB >> 11173719

Humalog Mix25 offers better mealtime glycemic control in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes.

J K Malone1, H Yang, J R Woodworth, J Huang, B N Campaigne, J P Halle, J F Yale, L D Grossman.   

Abstract

To compare the postprandial glucodynamics of Humalog Mix25, (Humalog Mix75/25 in the US; Mix25), to human insulin 30/70 (Humulin 70/30 in the US; 30/70) in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Ninety-three patients with type 1 diabetes and 84 patients with type 2 diabetes were evaluated in two separate but identical protocols using a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, crossover design. Patients consumed test meals 5 minutes after equal doses of Mix25 or 30/70. Plasma glucose was measured at baseline and 15 minute intervals for 4 hours after the meal. Two-hour postprandial glucose (2pp), 2-hour glucose excursion (2pp(ex) ), glucose versus time area under the curve 0 to 4 hours (AUC(0-4) ) and glucose excursion area under the curve 0 to 2 and 0 to 4 hours (AUCex(0-2), AUCex(0-4) ) were calculated. For the combined patient population, Mix25 resulted in significantly lower 2pp (12.45 +/- 3.59 vs. 13.47 +/- 3.62 mmol/L; p <0.001), AUC(0-4) (44.45 +/- 12.20 vs. 47.25 +/- 11.97 mmol x h/L; p <0.001), and glucose excursion parameters: 2pp(ex) (3.20 +/- 2.72 vs. 4.40 +/- 2.81 mmol/L; p <0.001), AUCex(0-2) (5.45 +/- 3.15 vs 6.60 +/- 3.13 mmol x h/L; p <0.001), and AUCex(0-4) (7.57 +/- 8.37 vs. 11.02 +/- 8.47 mmol x h/L; p <0.001) compared to 30/70. Further analysis of the treatment by type of diabetes indicated that Mix25 provided nearly identical glucose excursion responses in type 1 and type 2 diabetes up to 2 hours after the test meal, in contrast to 30/70. Pre-meal injection of Mix25 resulted in lower postprandial blood glucose levels compared to 30/70. The postprandial blood glucose response following Mix25 was similar in patients with either type 1 or type 2 diabetes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11173719

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Metab        ISSN: 1262-3636            Impact factor:   6.041


  6 in total

Review 1.  Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of insulin lispro mixtures.

Authors:  Paris Roach; James R Woodworth
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Insulin lispro: a review of its use in the management of diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Dene Simpson; Paul L McCormack; Gillian M Keating; Katherine A Lyseng-Williamson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Premixed insulin analogues for the treatment of diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Alan J Garber
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Systematic review: comparative effectiveness and safety of premixed insulin analogues in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Rehan Qayyum; Shari Bolen; Nisa Maruthur; Leonard Feldman; Lisa M Wilson; Spyridon S Marinopoulos; Padmini Ranasinghe; Muhammed Amer; Eric B Bass
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 5.  A review of modern insulin analogue pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles in type 2 diabetes: improvements and limitations.

Authors:  M Evans; P M Schumm-Draeger; J Vora; A B King
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 6.577

Review 6.  Intensification of insulin therapy for type 2 diabetic patients in primary care: basal-bolus regimen versus premix insulin analogs: when and for whom?

Authors:  Ofri Mosenzon; Itamar Raz
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 19.112

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.