Literature DB >> 11172389

Rejection of pig liver xenografts in patients with liver failure: implications for xenotransplantation.

A J Tector1, M Berho, J A Fridell, A DiCarlo, S Liu, C Soderland, J S Barkun, P Metrakos, J I Tchervenkov.   

Abstract

The pathophysiological state of rejection in liver xenotransplantation is poorly understood. Data from clinical pig liver perfusion suggest that pig livers might be rejected less vigorously than pig hearts or kidneys. Pig livers used in clinical xenoperfusions were exposed to blood from patients with liver failure. We have shown in an animal model that transplant recipients with liver failure are less capable of initiating hyperacute rejection of a xenografted liver than a healthy transplant recipient. The goal of this report is to examine the pathological characteristics of pig livers used in 2 clinical pig liver perfusions and combine this information with in vitro studies of pig-to-human liver xenotransplantation to determine whether the findings in the perfused pig livers could be explained in part by the diminished capacity of the patient with liver failure to respond to xenogeneic tissue. Pathological analysis of the perfused pig livers showed immunoglobulin M deposition in the sinusoids with little evidence of complement activation. Our in vitro studies showed that serum from patients with liver failure caused less injury to pig liver endothelium than serum from healthy subjects. Serum from patients with liver failure had similar levels of xenoreactive antibodies as serum from healthy humans. Incubation of serum from patients with liver failure with pig hepatic endothelial cells generated less iC3b, Bb fragment, and C5b-9 than serum from healthy subjects. We conclude that the altered injury in the perfused pig livers can be attributed to the relative complement deficiency that accompanies liver failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11172389     DOI: 10.1053/jlts.2001.21281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  3 in total

Review 1.  Immunobiology of liver xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Burcin Ekser; Christopher Burlak; Joshua P Waldman; Andrew J Lutz; Leela L Paris; Massimiliano Veroux; Simon C Robson; Michael A Rees; David Ayares; Bruno Gridelli; A Joseph Tector; David Kc Cooper
Journal:  Expert Rev Clin Immunol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.473

Review 2.  Pig liver xenotransplantation as a bridge to allotransplantation: which patients might benefit?

Authors:  Burcin Ekser; Bruno Gridelli; A Joseph Tector; David K C Cooper
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2009-11-15       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 3.  Pig Liver Xenotransplantation: A Review of Progress Toward the Clinic.

Authors:  David K C Cooper; Ke-Feng Dou; Kai-Shan Tao; Zhao-Xu Yang; A Joseph Tector; Burcin Ekser
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.939

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.