Literature DB >> 11172367

Restoration of sensibility in irreparable ulnar and median nerve lesions with use of sensory nerve transfer: long-term follow-up of 20 cases.

T Ozkan1, K Ozer, A Gülgönen.   

Abstract

A prospective study was conducted to evaluate patient outcomes following sensory nerve transfer. Twenty patients with irreparable ulnar or median nerve lesions underwent the procedure. Nerve involvement was bilateral in 5 cases. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 29 years. The mean paralysis time and the average length of follow-up were 59 and 78 months, respectively. Eighteen of 20 patients attended a sensory re-education program after surgery. Outcome was assessed objectively by functional sensory recovery testing and by the British Medical Research Council standards. Subjective outcome was assessed by a questionnaire. Two-point discrimination of less than 10 mm was achieved in 15 of 25 hands. The mean functional sensory recovery score was 83. Eighteen of 20 patients reported that the function of their hands improved after the procedure. Good or excellent results were associated with immediate transfer of the nerve, young age, and patients' attendance to the sensory re-education program after surgery. No differences were found between the recovery of ulnar and median nerves. Based on these results we suggest that sensory nerve transfer is a simple and reliable way of restoring sensibility to the hand with favorably comparable results over conventional nerve grafting in selected cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11172367     DOI: 10.1053/jhsu.2001.20156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Am        ISSN: 0363-5023            Impact factor:   2.230


  7 in total

Review 1.  How to measure outcomes of peripheral nerve surgery.

Authors:  Yirong Wang; Malay Sunitha; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Hand Clin       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 1.907

2.  Redirection of cutaneous sensation from the hand to the chest skin of human amputees with targeted reinnervation.

Authors:  Todd A Kuiken; Paul D Marasco; Blair A Lock; R Norman Harden; Julius P A Dewald
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Sensory reanimation of the hand by transfer of the superficial branch of the radial nerve to the median and ulnar nerve.

Authors:  Thilo L Schenck; Shenyu Lin; Jessica K Stewart; Konstantin C Koban; Michaela Aichler; Farid Rezaeian; Riccardo E Giunta
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2016-10-09       Impact factor: 2.708

Review 4.  Sensory Neurotization of the Ulnar Nerve, Surgical Techniques and Functional Outcomes: A Review.

Authors:  Mỹ-Vân Nguyễn; Jérôme Pierrart; Vincent Crenn
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Outcome following nerve repair of high isolated clean sharp injuries of the ulnar nerve.

Authors:  René Post; Kornelis S de Boer; Martijn J A Malessy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Factors predicting sensory and motor recovery after the repair of upper limb peripheral nerve injuries.

Authors:  Bo He; Zhaowei Zhu; Qingtang Zhu; Xiang Zhou; Canbin Zheng; Pengliang Li; Shuang Zhu; Xiaolin Liu; Jiakai Zhu
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 5.135

Review 7.  Evidence-Based Approach to Timing of Nerve Surgery: A Review.

Authors:  Brendan J MacKay; Cameron T Cox; Ian L Valerio; Jeffrey A Greenberg; Gregory M Buncke; Peter J Evans; Deana M Mercer; Desirae M McKee; Ivica Ducic
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 1.539

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.