Literature DB >> 11171746

Evaluation of different minimally invasive techniques in pediatric cardiac surgery: is a full sternotomy always a necessity?

C Hagl1, U Stock, A Haverich, G Steinhoff.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: A variety of minimally invasive techniques have been recently introduced in adult cardiac surgery. Experiences with children and newborns are, however, limited. In this report, we present our first experiences with different methods of ministernotomies for closure of atrial septum defect (ASD) and ventricular septum defect (VSD) in pediatric cardiac patients. Also, the current literature for different surgical approaches is reviewed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-five pediatric patients (range, 4 months to 12 years old) underwent elective ASD or VSD closure. Surgical access was either without division of the sternum (group A, n = 5), with partial inferior sternotomy (group B, n = 5), total sternotomy with limited skin incision (group C, n = 5), or total sternotomy with full skin incision (group D, n = 10).
RESULTS: There were no severe intraoperative complications regarding exposure, cannulation, or bleeding. Conversion to full sternotomy was not necessary in any patient. Bypass time and cross-clamp time in groups A, B, and C were comparable to the standard operation (group D). However, preparation time was significantly increased in one minimally invasive group (group A vs group D, p<0.05). Despite general feasibility, the transxiphoidal access without sternotomy compromises exposure of the ascending aorta, resulting in impaired administration of cross-clamping, cardioplegia, and especially de-airing.
CONCLUSIONS: Transatrial pediatric cardiac operations can be performed without or with limited sternotomy. The partial sternotomy allows uncompromised exposure of the great vessels and should be favored over the transxiphoidal approach. The operative access and perioperative risk is comparable to a classical standard surgical approach. Advantages include improved cosmetic results in combination with a high degree of safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11171746     DOI: 10.1378/chest.119.2.622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  5 in total

1.  Two Different Minimally Invasive Techniques for Female Patients with Atrial Septal Defects: Totally Thoracoscopic Technique and Right Anterolateral Thoracotomy Technique.

Authors:  Ming Xu; Shaoping Zhu; Xianguo Wang; Hua Huang; Jinping Zhao
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 1.520

2.  How to set-up a program of minimally-invasive surgery for congenital heart defects.

Authors:  Juan-Miguel Gil-Jaurena; Ramón Pérez-Caballero; Ana Pita-Fernández; María-Teresa González-López; Jairo Sánchez; Juan-Carlos De Agustín
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2016-07

3.  Anterior Minithoracotomy: a Safe Approach for Surgical ASD Closure & ASD Device Retrieval.

Authors:  Vivek Wadhawa; Chirag Doshi; Manish Hinduja; Pankaj Garg; Kartik Patel; Amit Mishra; Pratik Shah
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug

Review 4.  Minimally invasive paediatric cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Emile Bacha; David Kalfa
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 32.419

5.  Minimally invasive approaches to atrial septal defect closure.

Authors:  Igor E Konstantinov; Yasuhiro Kotani; Edward Buratto; Antonia Schulz; Yaroslav Ivanov
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2022-04-02
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.