S S Kun1, C T Nakamura, J F Ripka, S L Davidson Ward, T G Keens. 1. Division of Pediatric Pulmonology, Childrens Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90027, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Positive-pressure ventilators are equipped with low-inspiratory-pressure alarms to protect patients from hypoventilation. Small uncuffed tracheostomy tubes have a high resistance, and may not trigger these alarms during decannulation. STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether ventilator low-inspiratory-pressure alarms are effective in detecting tracheostomy decannulation. DESIGN: We connected tracheostomy tubes of varying inner diameters (3.0 to 6.0 mm) to a home ventilator and simulated decannulation using low (tidal volume [VT], 600 mL; peak inspiratory pressure [PIP], 25 cm H(2)O), medium (VT, 800 mL; PIP, 30 cm H(2)O), and high (VT, 1,000 mL; PIP, 35 cm H(2)O) ventilator settings. RESULTS: When the ventilator low-inspiratory-pressure alarm was set at 4 cm H(2)O below the desired PIP, it failed to alarm for simulated decannulation of tracheostomy tubes < 4.5 mm on low and medium settings, and < 4.0 mm on high settings. When the ventilator low-inspiratory-pressure alarm was set at 10 cm H(2)O below the desired PIP, it failed to alarm with tracheostomy tubes < 6.0 mm. CONCLUSION: We conclude that ventilator low-inspiratory-pressure alarms fail to alarm during simulated decannulation with small tracheostomy tubes commonly used in children. We speculate that low-inspiratory-pressure alarms set at 4 cm H(2)O below the desired PIP will detect more decannulation than when set at 10 cm H(2)O below the desired PIP.
BACKGROUND: Positive-pressure ventilators are equipped with low-inspiratory-pressure alarms to protect patients from hypoventilation. Small uncuffed tracheostomy tubes have a high resistance, and may not trigger these alarms during decannulation. STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether ventilator low-inspiratory-pressure alarms are effective in detecting tracheostomy decannulation. DESIGN: We connected tracheostomy tubes of varying inner diameters (3.0 to 6.0 mm) to a home ventilator and simulated decannulation using low (tidal volume [VT], 600 mL; peak inspiratory pressure [PIP], 25 cm H(2)O), medium (VT, 800 mL; PIP, 30 cm H(2)O), and high (VT, 1,000 mL; PIP, 35 cm H(2)O) ventilator settings. RESULTS: When the ventilator low-inspiratory-pressure alarm was set at 4 cm H(2)O below the desired PIP, it failed to alarm for simulated decannulation of tracheostomy tubes < 4.5 mm on low and medium settings, and < 4.0 mm on high settings. When the ventilator low-inspiratory-pressure alarm was set at 10 cm H(2)O below the desired PIP, it failed to alarm with tracheostomy tubes < 6.0 mm. CONCLUSION: We conclude that ventilator low-inspiratory-pressure alarms fail to alarm during simulated decannulation with small tracheostomy tubes commonly used in children. We speculate that low-inspiratory-pressure alarms set at 4 cm H(2)O below the desired PIP will detect more decannulation than when set at 10 cm H(2)O below the desired PIP.
Authors: Paul E Moore; Debra Boyer; Michael G O'Connor; Christopher D Baker; Jordan S Rettig; Laura Sterni; Ann Halbower; Kevin C Wilson; Carey C Thomson Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2016-07
Authors: Laura M Sterni; Joseph M Collaco; Christopher D Baker; John L Carroll; Girish D Sharma; Jan L Brozek; Jonathan D Finder; Veda L Ackerman; Raanan Arens; Deborah S Boroughs; Jodi Carter; Karen L Daigle; Joan Dougherty; David Gozal; Katharine Kevill; Richard M Kravitz; Tony Kriseman; Ian MacLusky; Katherine Rivera-Spoljaric; Alvaro J Tori; Thomas Ferkol; Ann C Halbower Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2016-04-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Jasneek Chawla; Elizabeth A Edwards; Amanda L Griffiths; Gillian M Nixon; Sadasivam Suresh; Jacob Twiss; Moya Vandeleur; Karen A Waters; Andrew C Wilson; Susan Wilson; Andrew Tai Journal: Respirology Date: 2021-08-13 Impact factor: 6.175