Literature DB >> 11170715

Subordinates explore but dominants profit: resource competition in high Arctic barnacle goose flocks.

Julia Stahl1, Peter H. Tolsma, Maarten J. J. E. Loonen, Rudolf H. Drent.   

Abstract

Social dominance plays an important role in assessing and obtaining access to patchy or scarce food sources in group-foraging herbivores. We investigated the foraging strategies of individuals with respect to their social position in the group in a flock of nonbreeding, moulting barnacle geese, Branta leucopsis, on high Arctic Spitsbergen. We first determined the dominance rank of individually marked birds. The dominance of an individual was best described by its age and its sex-specific body mass. Mating status explained the large variation in dominance among younger birds, as unpaired yearlings ranked lowest. In an artificially created, competitive situation, subordinate individuals occupied explorative front positions in the flock and were the first to find sites with experimentally enriched vegetation. Nevertheless, they were displaced quickly from these favourable sites by more dominant geese which were able to monopolize them. The enhanced sites were subsequently visited preferentially by individuals that succeeded in feeding there when the exclosures were first opened. Data on walking speed of foraging individuals and nearest-neighbour distances in the group suggest that subordinates try to compensate for a lower energy intake by exploring and by lengthening the foraging bout. Observations of our focal birds during the following breeding season revealed that females that returned to the study area were significantly more dominant in the previous year than those not seen in the area again. Copyright 2001 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 11170715     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  17 in total

1.  Frequency-dependent payoffs and sequential decision-making favour consistent tactic use.

Authors:  Frédérique Dubois; Luc-Alain Giraldeau; Denis Réale
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The effect of personality on social foraging: shy barnacle geese scrounge more.

Authors:  Ralf H J M Kurvers; Herbert H T Prins; Sipke E van Wieren; Kees van Oers; Bart A Nolet; Ronald C Ydenberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Active and passive social support in families of greylag geese (Anser anser).

Authors:  Isabella B R Scheiber; Brigitte M Weiß; Didone Frigerio; Kurt Kotrschal
Journal:  Behaviour       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 1.991

4.  Experimental manipulation of predation risk and food quality: effect on grazing behaviour in a central-place foraging herbivore.

Authors:  E S Bakker; R C Reiffers; H Olff; J M Gleichman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-10-22       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 5.  Patterns of predator neophobia: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Adam L Crane; Maud C O Ferrari
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Nonlinear effects of food aggregation on interference competition in mallards.

Authors:  Abel Gyimesi; Erica P van Rooij; Bart A Nolet
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  The effects of dominance on leadership and energetic gain: a dynamic game between pairs of social foragers.

Authors:  Sean A Rands
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Infection with Trypanosoma cruzi TcII and TcI in free-ranging population of lion tamarins (Leontopithecus spp): an 11-year follow-up.

Authors:  Cristiane Varella Lisboa; Rafael Veríssimo Monteiro; Andreia Fonseca Martins; Samantha Cristina das Chagas Xavier; Valdirene Dos Santos Lima; Ana Maria Jansen
Journal:  Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 2.743

9.  Benefits of family reunions: social support in secondary greylag goose families.

Authors:  Isabella B R Scheiber; Kurt Kotrschal; Brigitte M Weiss
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 3.587

10.  Neophobia in 10 ungulate species-a comparative approach.

Authors:  Alina Schaffer; Alvaro L Caicoya; Montserrat Colell; Ruben Holland; Lorenzo von Fersen; Anja Widdig; Federica Amici
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 2.980

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.