Literature DB >> 11170693

Dominance, reproduction and survival in banded mongooses: towards an egalitarian social system?

D. W. de Luca1, J. R. Ginsberg.   

Abstract

The banded mongoose, Mungos mungo, is a social species that forms multimale and multifemale family groups. Earlier studies suggest these family groups are relatively egalitarian with small differences in reproductive opportunities among individuals of different rank. In contrast, previous studies of other social mongooses have focused on species with more despotic control of reproduction (meerkats, Suricata suricatta, dwarf mongooses, Helogale parvula). In these species, the distribution of reproductive opportunities amongst individuals of different rank has met the predictions of reproductive skew theory: dominant individuals accrue greater reproductive benefits than subordinates, with subordinates breeding less often than dominants. In this paper we test how well two predictions of reproductive skew theory explain variance in measures of reproductive effort, and its correlates, in a wild population of banded mongooses in Queen Elizabeth National Park, Uganda. We measure dominance rank in males and females, and we investigate whether individuals of higher social rank accrue greater benefits than subordinates in terms of survival and reproduction. Banded mongoose dominance hierarchies showed linearity, but low reproductive skew. Rank was not significantly correlated with age. Furthermore, there were only small effects of dominance rank on nutritional levels, and no effects on reproduction and survival, suggesting that banded mongoose societies are indeed relatively egalitarian. No evidence of reproductive suppression was found and other forms of reproductive control were not observed. However, we do not exclude the possibility of increased reproductive competition in circumstances of higher ecological constraints. These findings show that reproductive skew theory is equally useful in explaining variation in reproduction in societies with low reproductive skew, as it is in explaining the allocation of reproductive effort in despotic social systems. Copyright 2001 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 11170693     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1559

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  8 in total

1.  Are reproductive skew models evolutionarily stable?

Authors:  Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  The adaptive value of sociality in mammalian groups.

Authors:  Joan B Silk
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  A longitudinal analysis of reproductive skew in male rhesus macaques.

Authors:  Anja Widdig; Fred B Bercovitch; Wolf Jürgen Streich; Ulrike Sauermann; Peter Nürnberg; Michael Krawczak
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Reproductive control via eviction (but not the threat of eviction) in banded mongooses.

Authors:  Michael A Cant; Sarah J Hodge; Matthew B V Bell; Jason S Gilchrist; Hazel J Nichols
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  The vocal repertoire in a solitary foraging carnivore, Cynictis penicillata, may reflect facultative sociality.

Authors:  Aliza Le Roux; Michael I Cherry; Marta B Manser
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2009-02-27

6.  Evolving nutritional strategies in the presence of competition: a geometric agent-based model.

Authors:  Alistair M Senior; Michael A Charleston; Mathieu Lihoreau; Jerome Buhl; David Raubenheimer; Stephen J Simpson
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Association with humans and seasonality interact to reverse predictions for animal space use.

Authors:  Peter N Laver; Kathleen A Alexander
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2018-04-28       Impact factor: 3.600

8.  Intragroup competition predicts individual foraging specialisation in a group-living mammal.

Authors:  Catherine E Sheppard; Richard Inger; Robbie A McDonald; Sam Barker; Andrew L Jackson; Faye J Thompson; Emma I K Vitikainen; Michael A Cant; Harry H Marshall
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 9.492

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.