Literature DB >> 11169572

Automatic signal classification in fluorescence in situ hybridization images.

B Lerner1, W F Clocksin, S Dhanjal, M A Hultén, C M Bishop.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous systems for dot (signal) counting in fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) images have relied on an auto-focusing method for obtaining a clearly defined image. Because signals are distributed in three dimensions within the nucleus and artifacts such as debris and background fluorescence can attract the focusing method, valid signals can be left unfocused or unseen. This leads to dot counting errors, which increase with the number of probes.
METHODS: The approach described here dispenses with auto-focusing, and instead relies on a neural network (NN) classifier that discriminates between in and out-of-focus images taken at different focal planes of the same field of view. Discrimination is performed by the NN, which classifies signals of each image as valid data or artifacts (due to out of focusing). The image that contains no artifacts is the in-focus image selected for dot count proportion estimation.
RESULTS: Using an NN classifier and a set of features to represent signals improves upon previous discrimination schemes that are based on nonadaptable decision boundaries and single-feature signal representation. Moreover, the classifier is not limited by the number of probes. Three classification strategies, two of them hierarchical, have been examined and found to achieve each between 83% and 87% accuracy on unseen data. Screening, while performing dot counting, of in and out-of-focus images based on signal classification suggests an accurate and efficient alternative to that obtained using an auto-focusing mechanism. Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11169572     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0320(20010201)43:2<87::aid-cyto1022>3.0.co;2-#

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytometry        ISSN: 0196-4763


  5 in total

1.  Automated analysis of fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) labeled genetic biomarkers in assisting cervical cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Xingwei Wang; Bin Zheng; Roy R Zhang; Shibo Li; Xiaodong Chen; John J Mulvihill; Xianglan Lu; Hui Pang; Hong Liu
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-06

2.  DMNet: Dual-Stream Marker Guided Deep Network for Dense Cell Segmentation and Lineage Tracking.

Authors:  Rina Bao; Noor M Al-Shakarji; Filiz Bunyak; Kannappan Palaniappan
Journal:  IEEE Int Conf Comput Vis Workshops       Date:  2021-11-24

3.  An objective comparison of cell-tracking algorithms.

Authors:  Vladimír Ulman; Martin Maška; Klas E G Magnusson; Olaf Ronneberger; Carsten Haubold; Nathalie Harder; Pavel Matula; Petr Matula; David Svoboda; Miroslav Radojevic; Ihor Smal; Karl Rohr; Joakim Jaldén; Helen M Blau; Oleh Dzyubachyk; Boudewijn Lelieveldt; Pengdong Xiao; Yuexiang Li; Siu-Yeung Cho; Alexandre C Dufour; Jean-Christophe Olivo-Marin; Constantino C Reyes-Aldasoro; Jose A Solis-Lemus; Robert Bensch; Thomas Brox; Johannes Stegmaier; Ralf Mikut; Steffen Wolf; Fred A Hamprecht; Tiago Esteves; Pedro Quelhas; Ömer Demirel; Lars Malmström; Florian Jug; Pavel Tomancak; Erik Meijering; Arrate Muñoz-Barrutia; Michal Kozubek; Carlos Ortiz-de-Solorzano
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  Quantitative 3D analysis of complex single border cell behaviors in coordinated collective cell migration.

Authors:  Adam Cliffe; David P Doupé; HsinHo Sung; Isaac Kok Hwee Lim; Kok Haur Ong; Li Cheng; Weimiao Yu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  FuseFISH: robust detection of transcribed gene fusions in single cells.

Authors:  Stefan Semrau; Nicola Crosetto; Magda Bienko; Marina Boni; Paolo Bernasconi; Roberto Chiarle; Alexander van Oudenaarden
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 9.423

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.